|
|||||||
Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Stay healthy and don't regress. I'd be happy if he just becomes a good rotational piece that's not a liability...
31Likes |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
09-01-2016, 07:55 AM
|
#1 |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bella vista. Arkansas
Posts: 35
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
Stay healthy and don't regress. I'd be happy if he just becomes a good rotational piece that's not a liability
|
|
|
|
09-01-2016, 04:18 PM
|
#2 |
|
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,627
|
Re: Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing?
Originally Posted by cajun1977
This.
Anything beyond that is gravy |
|
|
|
|
«
Finnegan out; Lutz in!
|
Simple, yet multiple and daring: Under Dennis Allen, the Saints want their defense to take the fight to the offense | Saints | theadvocate.com
»
Hybrid Mode
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/79433-krueger-needs-x-deemed-successful-signing.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
| Krueger needs to "X" to be deemed a successful signing? | This thread | Refback | 09-01-2016 11:04 AM | 2 |
| The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 09-01-2016 08:06 AM | 10 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 AM.
