Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Playoff contenders

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by AllSaints Buccaneers, Redskins, Packers, Vikings..... Bucs? Uhh no! Is this a serious comment? Do you actually think they are significantly better than we are? Why? Redskins, they are not significantly better than we are. Probably equal to ...

Like Tree20Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2016, 05:37 PM   #41
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,715
Re: Playoff contenders

Originally Posted by AllSaints View Post
Buccaneers, Redskins, Packers, Vikings.....

Bucs? Uhh no! Is this a serious comment? Do you actually think they are significantly better than we are? Why?

Redskins, they are not significantly better than we are. Probably equal to us I'll admit but no, they are not significantly better than we are.

Packers? Maybe. Their offense and defense were just mediocre last year. I don't think they made any significant changes either. We improved quite a bit more on defense than they did. Might be your only valid point, but I wouldn't say they're much better than we are.

Vikings, they just lost their 2nd best player on offense for the year. Bradford is no Teddy Bridgewater. Shaun Hill will be taking snaps by week 8.

Just my opinion but I think your wrong on all 4 points.
Danno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2016, 05:45 PM   #42
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,267
Re: Playoff contenders

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Bucs? Uhh no! Is this a serious comment? Do you actually think they are significantly better than we are? Why?

Redskins, they are not significantly better than we are. Probably equal to us I'll admit but no, they are not significantly better than we are.

Packers? Maybe. Their offense and defense were just mediocre last year. I don't think they made any significant changes either. We improved quite a bit more on defense than they did. Might be your only valid point, but I wouldn't say they're much better than we are.

Vikings, they just lost their 2nd best player on offense for the year. Bradford is no Teddy Bridgewater. Shaun Hill will be taking snaps by week 8.

Just my opinion but I think your wrong on all 4 points.

The packers.........they have the best QB in the NFL who can make crazy TD passes at the end, a WR who can burn CBs because of Cobb and Lacy and now Cook. Rodgers can see over his linemen unlike Brees and does not need great protection he just needs Nelson. Rodgers can do things with a bad line that Brees cannot.

And trust me if you don't want Carolina to win a SB you better be hoping for GB to win because they are the only team that can win in Carolina in January because they are not a west coast team. I sure would hope GB was that much better than us if we were not good because I believe Carolina has no chance in Lambeau in January. A inexperienced playoff team is not even beating Carolina at home sorry to say. There are only three teams and two of them are fighting each other in the division which takes away from their HFA potential because of the other two pesty rivals.
WillSaints81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2016, 05:52 PM   #43
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,070
Re: Playoff contenders

Originally Posted by WillSaints81 View Post
The packers.........they have the best QB in the NFL who can make crazy TD passes at the end, a WR who can burn CBs because of Cobb and Lacy and now Cook. Rodgers can see over his linemen unlike Brees and does not need great protection he just needs Nelson. Rodgers can do things with a bad line that Brees cannot.

And trust me if you don't want Carolina to win a SB you better be hoping for GB to win because they are the only team that can win in Carolina in January because they are not a west coast team. I sure would hope GB was that much better than us if we were not good because I believe Carolina has no chance in Lambeau in January. A inexperienced playoff team is not even beating Carolina at home sorry to say. There are only three teams and two of them are fighting each other in the division which takes away from their HFA potential because of the other two pesty rivals.
I know you can't read this, but you put far too much confidence in Carolina. The fifteen wins last season were smoke and mirrors. They had every break imaginable go their way. They were exposed by a weak Atlanta squad at the end of the regular season and totally demoralized by a team with a shell of a player at QB. I can easily see them dropping two or three in a row early and that ***** Newton pouting through the rest of the season.
AsylumGuido is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2016, 05:56 PM   #44
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,715
Re: Playoff contenders

Originally Posted by WillSaints81 View Post
The packers.........they have the best QB in the NFL who can make crazy TD passes at the end, a WR who can burn CBs because of Cobb and Lacy and now Cook. Rodgers can see over his linemen unlike Brees and does not need great protection he just needs Nelson. Rodgers can do things with a bad line that Brees cannot.

And trust me if you don't want Carolina to win a SB you better be hoping for GB to win because they are the only team that can win in Carolina in January because they are not a west coast team. I sure would hope GB was that much better than us if we were not good because I believe Carolina has no chance in Lambeau in January. A inexperienced playoff team is not even beating Carolina at home sorry to say. There are only three teams and two of them are fighting each other in the division which takes away from their HFA potential because of the other two pesty rivals.

Packers vs. Saints - Box Score - October 26, 2014 - ESPN
Saints 44
Packers 23

With the 2nd worst defense in the history of the NFL I might add.

I'm not sold they're significantly better than we are at all.
Danno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2016, 05:56 PM   #45
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,715
Re: Playoff contenders

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido View Post
I know you can't read this, but you put far too much confidence in Carolina. The fifteen wins last season were smoke and mirrors. They had every break imaginable go their way. They were exposed by a weak Atlanta squad at the end of the regular season and totally demoralized by a team with a shell of a player at QB. I can easily see them dropping two or three in a row early and that ***** Newton pouting through the rest of the season.
He can now.
AsylumGuido and Mr.Riaton like this.
Danno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2016, 07:03 PM   #46
Breakin Records
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Deville, Louisiana
Posts: 2,167
Re: Playoff contenders

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Bucs? Uhh no! Is this a serious comment? Do you actually think they are significantly better than we are? Why?

Redskins, they are not significantly better than we are. Probably equal to us I'll admit but no, they are not significantly better than we are.

Packers? Maybe. Their offense and defense were just mediocre last year. I don't think they made any significant changes either. We improved quite a bit more on defense than they did. Might be your only valid point, but I wouldn't say they're much better than we are.

Vikings, they just lost their 2nd best player on offense for the year. Bradford is no Teddy Bridgewater. Shaun Hill will be taking snaps by week 8.

Just my opinion but I think your wrong on all 4 points.
Vikings have a very good defense that can carry them into the postseason... Packers have Aaron Rodgers need I say more... Redskins have Cousins who IMO is a franchise QB and redskins Defense is very good.... Bucs defense is very good and another year with Winston they will improve ... Not saying these teams are significantly better than we are ... But they are better... We are a 7-9 football team... Changes on defense we made yeah that's great but our Guards are trash we can't win football games when Brees is running for his life ...
AllSaints is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2016, 07:08 PM   #47
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,070
Re: Playoff contenders

Originally Posted by AllSaints View Post
Vikings have a very good defense that can carry them into the postseason... Packers have Aaron Rodgers need I say more... Redskins have Cousins who IMO is a franchise QB and redskins Defense is very good.... Bucs defense is very good and another year with Winston they will improve ... Not saying these teams are significantly better than we are ... But they are better... We are a 7-9 football team... Changes on defense we made yeah that's great but our Guards are trash we can't win football games when Brees is running for his life ...
We WERE a 7-9 football team with back to back historically bad defenses. Our guards are no worse than they were last year when we finished 7-9. Our WR's are better with the addition of Thomas and another year of development of Cooks and Snead. Our RB's are solid and better with Ingram and Spiller both coming in healthy.
AsylumGuido is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2016, 08:38 PM   #48
Breakin Records
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Deville, Louisiana
Posts: 2,167
Re: Playoff contenders

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido View Post
We WERE a 7-9 football team with back to back historically bad defenses. Our guards are no worse than they were last year when we finished 7-9. Our WR's are better with the addition of Thomas and another year of development of Cooks and Snead. Our RB's are solid and better with Ingram and Spiller both coming in healthy.
True... But I'm coming off preseason... I saw improvement from the defense but still really young... Our guards are no worse but not any better what good is having heathy running backs when you can't make holes... What good is having a new WR when you barely have time to take 3 steps back and throw the ball... Brees needs time to step up in the pocket didn't have it last year... Won't have it this year... 7-9 football team ... Oline is everything and we failed to upgrade that...

I'm going to be cheering for this team to win every game like I always have... That will never change ... But the place we needed improvement oline didn't happen so I see another 7-9 aka mediocre season...

I just want a pass rush... Is that so hard to find.... Apparently....
AllSaints is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2016, 10:42 PM   #49
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Broussard,La.
Posts: 1,264
Re: Playoff contenders

Originally Posted by spkb25 View Post
GB, Dallas, Washington, Minnesota

Possible, don't know yet, Eagles and Bears

Other possibilities include:

Rams, Atlanta, and the Bucs
Agree with you on the Rams
Mr.Riaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2016, 06:21 AM   #50
LB Mentallity
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 15,870
Blog Entries: 68
Re: Playoff contenders

record is 0-0. We are tied for the best record in the NFL
AsylumGuido and K Major like this.
hagan714 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/79463-playoff-contenders.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 09-04-2016 08:53 PM 14
Playoff contenders This thread Refback 09-04-2016 08:28 PM 2
The Latest NFL News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 09-04-2016 08:28 PM 1


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts