Howard For Woodson

saintswhodi · 03-11-2005, 11:10 AM

If we can\'t afford Howard, no way in hell we afford Woodson. The POSTONS are his agents. The guys that make Orlando Pace get franchised every year until he fired them, and NOW he is working on a long term deal. the guys that had Julian Peterson saying he wanted a signing bonus like Peyton Manning? The guys who said they wanted Kellen Winslow to be paid like the number one pick. A TE???? No matter how good he may go back to being, we DO not want nor can we afford that headache. If it came down to that, i\'d keep Howard. This is just a bad idea.

papz · 03-11-2005, 11:14 AM

It\'s okay, you didn\'t know money grows on trees? I have 4 of them in my backyard.

WhoDat · 03-11-2005, 11:17 AM

Blah, blah, blah. All of our talent will be let go or traded within the next 3 or 4 years anyway Whoodi. Accept it. Deuce McAllister in SF. Joe Horn retires a Redskin. Grant signs with the Bucs. Stallworth acquired by Baltimore for a 4th rounder. McKenzie franchised twice then gone like Howard. I bet we keep Brooks though. Point is - take you\'re shot now, you don\'t have much time left. Go for broke, b/c IMO, taking a real shot and failing (4-12) is better than another year of play it safe all the way to 8-8.

saintswhodi · 03-11-2005, 11:20 AM

Damnit Who, you KNOW I am already on this train

taking a real shot and failing (4-12) is better than another year of play it safe all the way to 8-8.

Have you forgotten who you are talking to? But I still wanna be realistic. :P

saintswhodi · 03-11-2005, 11:21 AM

Besides, 4-12 = Matt Leinart, and I have already posted that I think this is the real plan.

GumboBC · 03-11-2005, 05:11 PM

These rumors about trading Howard for Woodson seem to be growing. I think there might be some truth to it.

I\'m for the trade myself. Woodson has missed less games in his whole career than what Howard has missed in 2-years.

Seems like a good deal to me.

WhoDat · 03-11-2005, 05:29 PM

Holy Carp. Billy and I agree on a personnel move? Run for cover the sky is falling!!!!

saintswhodi · 03-11-2005, 05:39 PM

It is a miracle, too bad you\'re both :seeingstars: and :nutz: . lol

FireVenturi · 03-11-2005, 05:49 PM

Woodson is a big name and would sell tickets, but I don\'t think it\'s the move we need. We need a LB. We need a CB too, but one who is not a distraction and who is injury prone. Keep in mind, Charles is represented by the Poston brothers. They hold out everyone(Orlando Pace, Kellen Winslow, II, etc.). Not really something I think we need to deal with. Too much style and not enough substance IMO. LB-LB-LB-LB-LB-LB-LB!!!!!!!!! :casstet:

AGREE 100%

FireVenturi · 03-11-2005, 05:52 PM

POSTED ON kffl.com

Cowboys | Interested in Acquiring Howard? - from www.KFFL.com
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:53:14 -0800

Mike Sando, of the Tacoma News Tribune, reports the Dallas Cowboys have expressed interest in acquiring DE Darren Howard from the New Orleans Saints. Howard was designated the Saints\' franchise player this year.

Who Do the Cowgirls have that we want, or when do they pick?

Their 1st, 1st rd pk is what we want and more specifically...........DERRICK JOHNSON, but i like our guys lets stick with the LB\'s we have!!

03-11-2005, 11:10 AM	#21
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Howard For Woodson If we can\'t afford Howard, no way in hell we afford Woodson. The POSTONS are his agents. The guys that make Orlando Pace get franchised every year until he fired them, and NOW he is working on a long term deal. the guys that had Julian Peterson saying he wanted a signing bonus like Peyton Manning? The guys who said they wanted Kellen Winslow to be paid like the number one pick. A TE???? No matter how good he may go back to being, we DO not want nor can we afford that headache. If it came down to that, i\'d keep Howard. This is just a bad idea.

03-11-2005, 11:14 AM	#22
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,744	Howard For Woodson It\'s okay, you didn\'t know money grows on trees? I have 4 of them in my backyard.

03-11-2005, 11:17 AM	#23
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Howard For Woodson Blah, blah, blah. All of our talent will be let go or traded within the next 3 or 4 years anyway Whoodi. Accept it. Deuce McAllister in SF. Joe Horn retires a Redskin. Grant signs with the Bucs. Stallworth acquired by Baltimore for a 4th rounder. McKenzie franchised twice then gone like Howard. I bet we keep Brooks though. Point is - take you\'re shot now, you don\'t have much time left. Go for broke, b/c IMO, taking a real shot and failing (4-12) is better than another year of play it safe all the way to 8-8.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	\"Excuses, excuses, excuses. ThatÃ¢Â€Â™s all anyone ever makes for the New Orleans SaintsÃ¢Â€Â™ organization.\" - Eric Narcisse \"Being a Saints fan is almost like being addicted to crack,\" he said.[i]\"You know you should stop, but you just can\'t.\"

03-11-2005, 11:20 AM	#24
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Howard For Woodson Damnit Who, you KNOW I am already on this train taking a real shot and failing (4-12) is better than another year of play it safe all the way to 8-8. Have you forgotten who you are talking to? But I still wanna be realistic. :P

03-11-2005, 11:21 AM	#25
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Howard For Woodson Besides, 4-12 = Matt Leinart, and I have already posted that I think this is the real plan.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

03-11-2005, 05:11 PM	#26
GumboBC Banned Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 2,616	Howard For Woodson These rumors about trading Howard for Woodson seem to be growing. I think there might be some truth to it. I\'m for the trade myself. Woodson has missed less games in his whole career than what Howard has missed in 2-years. Seems like a good deal to me.
GumboBC Banned Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 2,616

03-11-2005, 05:29 PM	#27
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Howard For Woodson Holy Carp. Billy and I agree on a personnel move? Run for cover the sky is falling!!!!
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631

03-11-2005, 05:39 PM	#28
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Howard For Woodson It is a miracle, too bad you\'re both :seeingstars: and :nutz: . lol

03-11-2005, 05:49 PM	#29
FireVenturi Cold as Ice! Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Da Big Easy Posts: 2,978	Howard For Woodson Woodson is a big name and would sell tickets, but I don\'t think it\'s the move we need. We need a LB. We need a CB too, but one who is not a distraction and who is injury prone. Keep in mind, Charles is represented by the Poston brothers. They hold out everyone(Orlando Pace, Kellen Winslow, II, etc.). Not really something I think we need to deal with. Too much style and not enough substance IMO. LB-LB-LB-LB-LB-LB-LB!!!!!!!!! :casstet: AGREE 100%

03-11-2005, 05:52 PM	#30
FireVenturi Cold as Ice! Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Da Big Easy Posts: 2,978	Howard For Woodson POSTED ON kffl.com Cowboys \| Interested in Acquiring Howard? - from www.KFFL.com Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:53:14 -0800 Mike Sando, of the Tacoma News Tribune, reports the Dallas Cowboys have expressed interest in acquiring DE Darren Howard from the New Orleans Saints. Howard was designated the Saints\' franchise player this year. Who Do the Cowgirls have that we want, or when do they pick? Their 1st, 1st rd pk is what we want and more specifically...........DERRICK JOHNSON, but i like our guys lets stick with the LB\'s we have!!