|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Larry Fitzgerald hints at playing elsewhere in 2017 | ProFootballTalk Drew to Larry would be a sick combo....
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Welcome to the Saints, Larry?
Larry Fitzgerald hints at playing elsewhere in 2017 | ProFootballTalk
Drew to Larry would be a sick combo. ![]() | |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Of The Mason Dixon Line
Posts: 7,113
|
Re: Welcome to the Saints, Larry?
This guy can almost write his own ticket for any team he wants. However the clock is ticking for him, he needs to find a team that's on the threshold. If he doesn't get the right team it's pretty much "thanks for the memories".
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Haven Ct
Posts: 23,989
|
Re: Welcome to the Saints, Larry?
That would be sooooooo cool.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,267
|
Re: Welcome to the Saints, Larry?
No thanks he would just affect Snead and imporantly Thomas's volume.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 3
|
Re: Welcome to the Saints, Larry?
He'll end up with the Pats.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Site Donor 2018
|
Re: Welcome to the Saints, Larry?
We don't need him, we've already got the best WR set in the NFL...
What we need is a blocking/occasional pass catching tight end like Ben Watson - ideal complement... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,422
|
Re: Welcome to the Saints, Larry?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Site Donor 2019
|
Re: Welcome to the Saints, Larry?
Originally Posted by blackangold
"Fix" meaning ... Saints can't continue to make moves like drafting a left tackle in the 1st and trying to force him to play on the right side. We also need two dominant GUARDS. Armstead is dominant when healthy & Unger is solid. I never said the line was broke.![]()
6th ranked O line? ... Brees makes this Oline (at least statistically) appear far better than what it truly is. |
![]() |
![]() |