|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Offense WR 83 Stallworth, Donte' - C LT 72 Gandy, Wayne -C LG 64 Jacox, Kendyl - C C 65 Bentley, LeCharles - C (due to switching to center) RG 61 Holland, Montrae -C RT 68 Riley, Victor -F TE ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-19-2005, 12:29 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
Grading the offensive talent in 2004
Offense
WR 83 Stallworth, Donte' - C LT 72 Gandy, Wayne -C LG 64 Jacox, Kendyl - C C 65 Bentley, LeCharles - C (due to switching to center) RG 61 Holland, Montrae -C RT 68 Riley, Victor -F TE 82 Williams, Boo -D WR 87 Horn, Joe -A QB 2 Brooks, Aaron -C (due to the offensive line and injury to Deuce) RB 26 McAllister, Deuce -C (because of injury) FB 44 Karney, Mike - C [Edited on 19/3/2005 by GumboBC] |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
03-19-2005, 05:58 PM | #2 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Grading the offensive talent in 2004
Hmmm...
Stallworth - C+ (stayed healthy, showed flashes, get him the ball deep... damn it) Gandy - C+ (toward the downside of his career) Jacox - C (serviceable) Bentley - B (started off slow at the new position) Holland - C+ (pretty athletic for a big boy, still young) Riley - D- (snap count buddy, snap count) Williams - C (concentrate on the ball!) Horn - A- (played hurt, played strong, ... played!) Brooks - C+ (up, down, up, down, up, down, up...) McAllister - B (hurt, line sucked, etc.) Karney - A- (beast, not enough playing time) |
03-19-2005, 07:18 PM | #3 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,097
|
Grading the offensive talent in 2004
im not so with gumbo on the o line being completely behind brooks\' problems. although he did run for his life at times. but he was as jkool put it up-down-up-down
|
03-20-2005, 03:58 AM | #4 |
100th Post
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monroe, La
Posts: 209
|
Grading the offensive talent in 2004
no way will i give McCalister a B. He lost a step running in the hole. He lack the vision for finding the cut back lanes in some games. The outside speed for hit the corner was gone. He never was a elusive back cuz of injury lack of power to break alot of tackles. The guy wasn\'t himself last year but I do expect him play to form like the year after his rookie year cuz this a contract year. The question is how do you keep him motivated after this year?
|
03-20-2005, 04:36 PM | #5 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Grading the offensive talent in 2004
Ok - C+ (hurt, line sucked, coaches told him to get fat...)
|
03-20-2005, 09:04 PM | #6 |
100th Post
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monroe, La
Posts: 209
|
Grading the offensive talent in 2004
hurt...that is his fault cuz of his conditioning in the offseason
line sucked...I\'ll give you that. They didn\'t get a great push on DL most of the time but their were a couple of cut back lanes and bounces to the outside he could\'ve ran if he was in better condition coaches told him to get fat....that is a assumption people made on here. Nowhere could I find truth to that when it 1st pop up on here. I have read alot where the coaches wanted him play at the weight of 220 - 225, that was the main reason they brought in differ conditioning coaches. This year they brought in differ RB coach. The guy need to stay motivated and the only way i see that possible is to put a incentive package in his contract that will have him |
|
|