New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com - NOLA.com Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Page 4 of 7

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)

- Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)

- - NOLA.com Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 (https://blackandgold.com/saints/82567-despite-defensive-needs-saints-pick-offensive-tackle-no-32-a.html)

|Mitch|

04-28-2017 10:40 AM

Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Armstead|Peat|Unger|Warford|Ramcyzk/Strief

On paper looks to be a solid line :bng:

Seer1

04-28-2017 10:42 AM

Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Papa Voodoo (Post 747074)

Warford, Ramczyk, AP. Kept Kuhn. We're going to be running plenty this year. Armstead-Peat-Unger-Warford-Streif is as much BEEF as we've had since Nicks left.

I was wondering about that last night. Is Sean considering keeping it on the ground more? All he would need to do is figure out the other side of the ball. A strong ground game needs a strong D.

A strong run game with nuclear strike capabilities would be awesome!

Championship!

frydaddy

04-28-2017 10:43 AM

Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Best OT in a weak draft for O-linemen. That's inspiring.

Ashley

04-28-2017 10:56 AM

Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Again I like the pick, but if from what I hear from the expert analyst that have repeatedly said he will be a back up. I'm hoping get he starts straight up.
All I am saying is I would rather have Defense. 11 DE, 32 lb, or corner.
And if he can get a sack somehow or cause turnovers. I'll do back flips with my Ole ass

RaginCajun83

04-28-2017 10:59 AM

Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

I love the OT pick, for years I've wanted a midwest country strong lineman. Looks like we got one, hopefully Payton is cured of his pass happyitis and they start to pound the ball all day on the ground with passes mixed in

|Mitch|

04-28-2017 11:00 AM

Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Quote:

"He's a technician even though he's only a one-year starter at Wisconsin. He's a day-one starter on the right side. They pair him with Terron Armstead. Drew Brees is a happy guy." -- Mike Mayock

...

AsylumGuido

04-28-2017 11:07 AM

Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Quote:

Originally Posted by ScottF (Post 747021)

Maybe he'd be there 10 picks later at 42, maybe not. Maybe he is an upgrade over Strief...

All I know if we could have jumped the Niners at 31 and gotten Foster, a second starter on defense for probably a 7th this year or next. Pissed.

And what would have cost to jump the Niners for Foster? It would have taken two picks, at least, including a third this season. Not worth it. There's too much talent left out there and Ramczyk was a bargain, and a need, at that spot.

|Mitch|

04-28-2017 11:21 AM

Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Quote:

Round 1, Pick 32 (No. 32) (From New England)

Ryan Ramczyk, OT, Wisconsin: An interesting conclusion to a wild night. This is the pick that the Saints acquired for trading Brandin Cooks to New England, but there weren’t many (any?) folks predicting they’d use it on a tackle. That’s not to say it is a nonsensical selection. Andrus Peat, the Saints’ 2015 first-rounder, has settled in at guard, and veteran Zach Strief turns 34 in September. So, the Saints got a jump on any potential future headaches by bringing in Ramczyk. The knock: It probably does not make New Orleans any better in 2017 unless Strief is headed out the door early. The defense could have used another body here. GRADE: B

...

lee909

04-28-2017 11:37 AM

Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Podcast i just listened too
We are loosers last night

Didnt fix the D and we had Malholmes and Foster stolen

Foster i can believe not Malholmes

K Major

04-28-2017 11:49 AM

Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Quote:

Originally Posted by lee909 (Post 747130)

Podcast i just listened too
We are loosers last night

Didnt fix the D and we had Malholmes and Foster stolen

Foster i can believe not Malholmes

FWIW, there is a "unconfirmed report" coming out now that Reuben Foster will require a second surgery on his shoulder. Possibly another reason why he slid so far down the draft board last night.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 PM.

Page 4 of 7

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page