|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I'm going to assume not too many New Orleans Saints fans were enamored with the team's selection of Wisconsin tackle Ryan Ramczyk at No. 32 overall in the NFL Draft. I get it. It wasn't "sexy." It wasn't a defensive ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-28-2017, 08:33 AM | #1 |
Rating:
(0 votes - average)
I'm going to assume not too many New Orleans Saints fans were enamored with the team's selection of Wisconsin tackle Ryan Ramczyk at No. 32 overall in the NFL Draft.
I get it. It wasn't "sexy." It wasn't a defensive player. It also wasn't an immediate need taken with the pick the team acquired from New England in the Brandin Cooks trade. Yet, there's no doubt the Saints chose the best available player on their draft board. So you can't really fault them in that sense. Ramczyk tied for NFL.com's highest grade of all the offensive linemen in this year's draft. The 6-foot-6, 310-pound tackle also was rated CBS Sports' 16th best overall prospect. The run of defensive players at the back end of the first round likely spurred this move by the Saints. read more on NOLA |
|
Views: 7788
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
04-28-2017, 08:42 AM | #3 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,220
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
Not only an heir apparent to Strief, but he may be able to win the job outright.
|
04-28-2017, 08:49 AM | #4 |
10000 POST CLUB
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
No not sexy, but the right pick considering the perceived depth of defense this year.
DE LB S WR CB Let's have a strong finish |
04-28-2017, 08:52 AM | #5 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Colorado Springs Co
Posts: 2,760
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
|
04-28-2017, 09:00 AM | #6 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
Maybe he'd be there 10 picks later at 42, maybe not. Maybe he is an upgrade over Strief...
All I know if we could have jumped the Niners at 31 and gotten Foster, a second starter on defense for probably a 7th this year or next. Pissed. |
04-28-2017, 09:19 AM | #7 |
Donated Plasma
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
The kind of pick that, if we're not going defense, is what I like. As other's have said you build from the lines, and this guy is going to be great on the o-line. I'm smiling.
|
04-28-2017, 09:20 AM | #8 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,482
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
Man, a lot of people don't get that the draft is about the future. If you draft straight up for need you're probably a terrible franchise.
|
04-28-2017, 09:28 AM | #10 |
LB Mentallity
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
|
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/82567-despite-defensive-needs-saints-pick-offensive-tackle-no-32-a.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 | This thread | Refback | 04-28-2017 09:03 AM | 3 |