JOESAM2002

I edited it because it was a personal attack and they are not allowed. If you don\'t want to participate in a thread then don\'t. Just because you don\'t want to read something that might have been posted before doesn\'t give you the right to attack the poster. I won\'t allow attacks on you or anyone else. I deleted the posts because they were only agitating the other posters. I deleted yours and Danno\'s so that it would be fair. If you don\'t want your posts edited, I suggest you lighten up on your attacks of others.

Sometimes it's better to keep your mouth shut and be thought an idiot, than to open it and remove all doubt!!!!!

"Every time you think, you weaken the nation!" Moe Howard...The Three Stooges.

lynwood

I remember we had this disscussion on a previous thread. It was pretty much a draw where no one really changed their mind on how they felt about the defensive or offensive performance. Stats were posted arguments were had and the lines were drawn. I don\'t think anything has changed since that last disscussion so this must be to provoke. So my two cents were offense didn\'t do squat to balance out the game. Half of a football game is still half. The defense was bad but the offense was sickening.

saintswhodi

How was what I posted a personal attack on anyone? I inquired as to why this topic was brought up AGAIN, and if the reason was to draw new arguments from some new guys. I then posted the part you didn\'t edit. AFTER THAT, I posted the links to the previous threads with the statement, that anyone who wasn\'t in on the initial discussion could read it, and then if they had somethign new to add, could.

Danno then come in being a smart ass, without knowing half the story. SO I asked him if he had been under a rock since noone has gotten into a Brooks discussion in over a month, an dI personally had sworn off of them. Where in that was there a personal attack? I didn\'t call anyone names or anything like that. I questioned the need for a thread we had already battled on, then posted links to those threads in an entirely different post. I am well aware of the rules, and was within them.

So I don\'t know what you read, I questioned the need for another post on this topic. I didn\'t call Gumbo stupid or any other names. I questioned the motivation for this topic, when it was beat into the ground a month ago. If that is a personal attack, then half the posts on this forum should be edited or deleted cause people\'s motivations are questioned more than 50% of the time. OF course this will probably be seen as trying to make your job hard, which in no way am I trying to do that. I respect what you do, but feel you read more into the situation than what was there. Why if I personally attacked someone would I then argue on the topic?