jeanpierre

Whether you're a fan of Fairley being signed long-term or not, am sure all hope for the best in his long-term health...

But this does seem to be another in a long line of questionable "missed" diagnosed evaluations that should have happened sooner...

In the case of Fairley, it should've happened prior to a long-term contract where it's starting to look as if Loomis has bid against himself and over-paid prematurely for a player...

I have a real time accepting that this condition only manifested in less than his being signed less than ninety (90) days (days) ago...

Gotta believe this is an extension of having an owner who's having his diapers changed and being virtually cuckold by his golddigger...

This is when we could use a slightly younger more active owner should say "Okay, Mickey, Sean, WTF?!? Why haven't we fired these Docs and secured a more reliable source of medical opinion than these quacks at Ochsner?!? WTH is going on that we keep getting straddled with poor medical opinion and making these decisions?"

Not that I don't have empathy for Fairley, I do. But I'm also a Saints fan who's invested and am getting tired of this recurring bad decision with bad information "process" by Sean Payton and Mickey Loomis...

It's not that my way is the right way, I just make the right way my way...