OK draft junkies, our 40th pick....

Danno · 03-29-2005, 08:09 AM

I assume we'll take the BPA at 16. Which won't be a LB unless DJ slips. So, that leaves a plethora of LB's to chose from with our 40th pick. There seems to be a ton of them projected as 2nd rounders so just for kicks, lets say there all there except DJ and Merriman.
Who would you pick at 40?

MLB
Barrett Ruud
Channing Crowder
Odell Thurman

OLB
Burnett
Boley
Blackstock

If all 6 of these guys are there, who do you want, and why?

[Edited on 29/3/2005 by Danno]

Saint_LB · 03-29-2005, 08:33 AM

A plethora? Definition please!!!

Anyway, I think I would go with either Ruud or Crowder. Why? Because I have read their names more than any other on this board...otherwise, I don\'t have a clue. It would be really nice if we had some videos to look at before choosing.

daniel · 03-29-2005, 08:47 AM

I don\'t think we will have this pick. I think we will trade up to the number four slot. The Bears need players not one great player. I still think DJ is the best player in the draft for us. He would be the BPA at four and would fit our need.But if I am wrong and the FO stays put, I would take Rudd.

LKelley67 · 03-29-2005, 09:25 AM

from discussions here OT, DT, and CB seem to be the most realistic and hopeful choices at #16. add an outside chance of alex smith that couldnt be turned down and count thomas davis at SS which is seems the front office here doesnt go for. if a OT or DT is taken at #16 i think a much better combination of better player available and need will be a CB at #40. as much as i have preached LB help is needed i think a marlin jackson, for example, at corner could have as much or more impact than some of those LB\'s. so i could see and not be disappointed if a top 5-6 corner was chosen.

as for those, i do like the idea of keeping watson inside. if a top veteran had been attained like hartwell it would be different. to add a rookie with the already thin on experienced LB crew it would be better to not move watson. those names are generally found at the top of most lists/projections. for #40 i think crowder and burnett are most likely to be gone already. i like burnett more. he has had a knee operation already but crowder has had several. other than that crowder is a mean machine too.

the most likely and best available of the other 4 imo is blackstock. he looks like a great pick. i think both thurman and ruud project in the #40 range. they might be gone but could slip a little past that too. thurman seems the higher rated pure talent wise but ruud is raved about character wise and his motor. (i could see him as the patriots #1)

boley would seem like a stretch up at #40 to me. he is more like a lower 2nd round at best. he would be a great pick at #82. i also think McCune and Lance Mitchell would be solid 3rd rounders.

Danno · 03-29-2005, 09:32 AM

from discussions here OT, DT, and CB seem to be the most realistic and hopeful choices at #16. add an outside chance of alex smith that couldnt be turned down and count thomas davis at SS which is seems the front office here doesnt go for. if a OT or DT is taken at #16 i think a much better combination of better player available and need will be a CB at #40. as much as i have preached LB help is needed i think a marlin jackson, for example, at corner could have as much or more impact than some of those LB\'s. so i could see and not be disappointed if a top 5-6 corner was chosen.

as for those, i do like the idea of keeping watson inside. if a top veteran had been attained like hartwell it would be different. to add a rookie with the already thin on experienced LB crew it would be better to not move watson. those names are generally found at the top of most lists/projections. for #40 i think crowder and burnett are most likely to be gone already. i like burnett more. he has had a knee operation already but crowder has had several. other than that crowder is a mean machine too.

the most likely and best available of the other 4 imo is blackstock. he looks like a great pick. i think both thurman and ruud project in the #40 range. they might be gone but could slip a little past that too. thurman seems the higher rated pure talent wise but ruud is raved about character wise and his motor. (i could see him as the patriots #1)

boley would seem like a stretch up at #40 to me. he is more like a lower 2nd round at best. he would be a great pick at #82. i also think McCune and Lance Mitchell would be solid 3rd rounders.

Ahhhhhhhh, thanks. I needed my draft junkie fix today.
I am now comfortably numb. :rauch06:

DT\'s after lunch.

BrooksMustGo · 03-29-2005, 10:24 AM

Chris Henry -- WR --West Virginia

or

Fred Gibson -- WR -- Georgia

Henderson isn\'t going to lock down the #2 spot during the offseason workouts.

Danno · 03-29-2005, 10:46 AM

Chris Henry -- WR --West Virginia

or

Fred Gibson -- WR -- Georgia

Henderson isn\'t going to lock down the #2 spot during the offseason workouts.

I thought Donte was #2.
Is he already hurt again?

baronm · 03-29-2005, 10:57 AM

if we go Wideout this early I will piss myself...I just think that like cornerback..there are alot of guys who will develop nicely..

but then again..who knows....I\'m starting to get on the cambell bandwagon...just to make sure we get a quality pick.

BrooksMustGo · 03-29-2005, 11:34 AM

[/quote:3d7f82d651]I thought Donte was #2.
Is he already hurt again?

[/quote:3d7f82d651]

Oops, little rusty. I was thinking #3.

I guess that I would basically look at whoever Kiper suggests and pick something totally different.

LKelley67 · 03-29-2005, 11:46 AM

blackstock says he talked to saints in his draft diary...

I spoke with representatives from Miami, Kansas City and New Orleans.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/3491568

03-29-2005, 08:33 AM	#2
Saint_LB Deuce Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 2,894	OK draft junkies, our 40th pick.... A plethora? Definition please!!! Anyway, I think I would go with either Ruud or Crowder. Why? Because I have read their names more than any other on this board...otherwise, I don\'t have a clue. It would be really nice if we had some videos to look at before choosing.
Saint_LB Deuce Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 2,894

03-29-2005, 08:47 AM	#3
daniel Rookie Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 28	OK draft junkies, our 40th pick.... I don\'t think we will have this pick. I think we will trade up to the number four slot. The Bears need players not one great player. I still think DJ is the best player in the draft for us. He would be the BPA at four and would fit our need.But if I am wrong and the FO stays put, I would take Rudd.
daniel Rookie Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 28

03-29-2005, 09:32 AM	#5
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,720	OK draft junkies, our 40th pick.... from discussions here OT, DT, and CB seem to be the most realistic and hopeful choices at #16. add an outside chance of alex smith that couldnt be turned down and count thomas davis at SS which is seems the front office here doesnt go for. if a OT or DT is taken at #16 i think a much better combination of better player available and need will be a CB at #40. as much as i have preached LB help is needed i think a marlin jackson, for example, at corner could have as much or more impact than some of those LB\'s. so i could see and not be disappointed if a top 5-6 corner was chosen. as for those, i do like the idea of keeping watson inside. if a top veteran had been attained like hartwell it would be different. to add a rookie with the already thin on experienced LB crew it would be better to not move watson. those names are generally found at the top of most lists/projections. for #40 i think crowder and burnett are most likely to be gone already. i like burnett more. he has had a knee operation already but crowder has had several. other than that crowder is a mean machine too. the most likely and best available of the other 4 imo is blackstock. he looks like a great pick. i think both thurman and ruud project in the #40 range. they might be gone but could slip a little past that too. thurman seems the higher rated pure talent wise but ruud is raved about character wise and his motor. (i could see him as the patriots #1) boley would seem like a stretch up at #40 to me. he is more like a lower 2nd round at best. he would be a great pick at #82. i also think McCune and Lance Mitchell would be solid 3rd rounders. Ahhhhhhhh, thanks. I needed my draft junkie fix today. I am now comfortably numb. :rauch06: DT\'s after lunch.

03-29-2005, 10:24 AM	#6
BrooksMustGo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,762	OK draft junkies, our 40th pick.... Chris Henry -- WR --West Virginia or Fred Gibson -- WR -- Georgia Henderson isn\'t going to lock down the #2 spot during the offseason workouts.

03-29-2005, 10:46 AM	#7
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,720	OK draft junkies, our 40th pick.... Chris Henry -- WR --West Virginia or Fred Gibson -- WR -- Georgia Henderson isn\'t going to lock down the #2 spot during the offseason workouts. I thought Donte was #2. Is he already hurt again?

03-29-2005, 08:09 AM	#1
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,720	OK draft junkies, our 40th pick.... I assume we'll take the BPA at 16. Which won't be a LB unless DJ slips. So, that leaves a plethora of LB's to chose from with our 40th pick. There seems to be a ton of them projected as 2nd rounders so just for kicks, lets say there all there except DJ and Merriman. Who would you pick at 40? MLB Barrett Ruud Channing Crowder Odell Thurman OLB Burnett Boley Blackstock If all 6 of these guys are there, who do you want, and why? [Edited on 29/3/2005 by Danno]

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

03-29-2005, 09:25 AM	#4
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	OK draft junkies, our 40th pick.... from discussions here OT, DT, and CB seem to be the most realistic and hopeful choices at #16. add an outside chance of alex smith that couldnt be turned down and count thomas davis at SS which is seems the front office here doesnt go for. if a OT or DT is taken at #16 i think a much better combination of better player available and need will be a CB at #40. as much as i have preached LB help is needed i think a marlin jackson, for example, at corner could have as much or more impact than some of those LB\'s. so i could see and not be disappointed if a top 5-6 corner was chosen. as for those, i do like the idea of keeping watson inside. if a top veteran had been attained like hartwell it would be different. to add a rookie with the already thin on experienced LB crew it would be better to not move watson. those names are generally found at the top of most lists/projections. for #40 i think crowder and burnett are most likely to be gone already. i like burnett more. he has had a knee operation already but crowder has had several. other than that crowder is a mean machine too. the most likely and best available of the other 4 imo is blackstock. he looks like a great pick. i think both thurman and ruud project in the #40 range. they might be gone but could slip a little past that too. thurman seems the higher rated pure talent wise but ruud is raved about character wise and his motor. (i could see him as the patriots #1) boley would seem like a stretch up at #40 to me. he is more like a lower 2nd round at best. he would be a great pick at #82. i also think McCune and Lance Mitchell would be solid 3rd rounders.

03-29-2005, 10:57 AM	#8
baronm 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 954	OK draft junkies, our 40th pick.... if we go Wideout this early I will piss myself...I just think that like cornerback..there are alot of guys who will develop nicely.. but then again..who knows....I\'m starting to get on the cambell bandwagon...just to make sure we get a quality pick.
baronm 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 954

03-29-2005, 11:34 AM	#9
BrooksMustGo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,762	OK draft junkies, our 40th pick.... [/quote:3d7f82d651]I thought Donte was #2. Is he already hurt again? [/quote:3d7f82d651] Oops, little rusty. I was thinking #3. I guess that I would basically look at whoever Kiper suggests and pick something totally different.

03-29-2005, 11:46 AM	#10
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	OK draft junkies, our 40th pick.... blackstock says he talked to saints in his draft diary... I spoke with representatives from Miami, Kansas City and New Orleans. http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/3491568