Kurt Warner vs. Peyton Manning
 

or a waste of time with no meaningful discourse

Kurt Warner vs. Peyton Manning
 

How \'bout I write a post on the past 37-year history of the Saints and dwell on all of the negatives?

Oh, yeah ... I forgot ... you do that on a daily basis.

No need for me to do it. :o

Kurt Warner vs. Peyton Manning
 

I have a challenge for you Billy.

Without belittling other Saints players - show me why AB is a good QB. Can you do that?

Kurt Warner vs. Peyton Manning
 

1. Brooks won the only playoff game in club history.
2. Our offense was the 2nd highest scoring in the NFC in 2002.
3. 24TDs/8Ints in 2003.

Kurt Warner vs. Peyton Manning
 

1. TEAM STAT
2. TEAM STAT

Both of those are irrelevant b/c they relate to the team, not Brooks. Remember - you\'re the guy who says that QBs don\'t individually deserve credit or blame for those types of things.

3. Yep - that was a good year throwing the ball. He also finished 8th in QB rating that year. Pretty darn respectible. Here are a few more stats related to that:

2003 - AB led the league in fumbles lost - that kind of undermines the low INT rate, don\'t you think?

Aside from his 8th place finish in 2003 in QB rating, he has finished 20th, 20th, and 19th. So does one \"good\" year in four make up for the three other \"below average\" years?

[Edited on 8/4/2005 by WhoDat]

Kurt Warner vs. Peyton Manning
 

c\'mon whodat why do you have to look at four years starting. 2003 alone was the true indicator. the other years there were bad receivers or bad line or bad play calling, etc. and you don\'t call averaging 17th is passer rating out of a 32 team league elite? you\'re looking at the wrong stats buddy.