|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I've let myself become too fascinated with all of the highly talented players in the draft. What I mean is: " I think about how one of the CBs might fall in our lap.". Or some other player at another ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-22-2005, 01:38 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
I'd rather reach for a LB than under-react!
I've let myself become too fascinated with all of the highly talented players in the draft.
What I mean is: " I think about how one of the CBs might fall in our lap.". Or some other player at another position. But the fact of the matter is, I think the only way the draft is truly going to upgrade our defense if is we draft a LB or a DT. And as strange as it might sound ... We might actually be weaker at DT than LB. Drafting a DT would not hurt my feelings at all. I'll take a DT over a CB any day of the week!! Drafting a CB in the 1st round would be very very foolish IMO. And I don't care if the best CB drops to us at #16. Unless that CB can stop the run, then I'll pass. Oh, yeah ... I know, we can always pick up a LB in the 2nd round. Yeah, well .... according to most of the experts, all the LBs in the 2nd are not expected to be probowl caliber LBs. IMHO ... We need a "play-maker" at LB. We need that one guy who can make a game-changing play. Are all the years of watching sub-standard play at LB starting to affect my decision making? You bet!! And I hope it's affecting Loomis and Haslett too!!! I'd rather come out of this draft with the highest rated LB rather than 5 guys who might make an impact. I'm tired or hoping one of our LBs step-up. Maybe it is an over-reaction. But, at this point ... I'd rather over-react than under-react. |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
04-22-2005, 02:02 PM | #2 |
100th Post
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 102
|
I'd rather reach for a LB than under-react!
I would consider one of the top CBs should he fall right to us...but like you, I\'m more inclined to jump on a DT that does the same. I personally don\'t see a \"runstuffer\" LB worthy of a first round selection in this year\'s draft (both Johnson and Davis--if move to WLB--are more \"run \'em down\" LBs than \"plug the gap\" guys), so the best course of action if we\'re intent on improving our run defense is to jump on a top DT should he fall, or go with one of the top three OT if a DT doesn\'t.
|
04-22-2005, 02:28 PM | #3 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
|
I'd rather reach for a LB than under-react!
|
04-22-2005, 02:32 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
I'd rather reach for a LB than under-react!
I\'m tellin\' you guys ... I\'m sick of us needing LBs. Sick, I tell ya!!
Maybe the dome-patrol made me fall in love with great LBs. Or maybe Orlando Ruff and crew made me hate our LBs. I don\'t know. But I do know I\'m sick of worring about LBs. What\'s it gonna take to get a play-making LB? It\'s not like I\'m asking Loomis and Haslett to solve world hunger. Just get me a damn play-making LB!!! PLEASE!!! |
04-22-2005, 02:37 PM | #5 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
I'd rather reach for a LB than under-react!
Again, awfully close to criticism.
|
04-22-2005, 02:48 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
I'd rather reach for a LB than under-react!
The thing is ... I just don\'t expect the worst and DWELL on the past like some of you do. |
04-22-2005, 02:49 PM | #7 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
I'd rather reach for a LB than under-react!
To answer your question, no I do not think you see the problems with this team. :P
|
04-22-2005, 02:51 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
I'd rather reach for a LB than under-react!
And Joe Horn makes him look better than what he is. If only we would have had another QB then we would have been in the playoffs every year. It\'s a damn shame. A damn shame, I tell ya!!! [Edited on 22/4/2005 by GumboBC] |
04-22-2005, 02:53 PM | #9 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
I'd rather reach for a LB than under-react!
A little over the top, but you are getting warmer. :P
|
04-22-2005, 03:23 PM | #10 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,762
|
I'd rather reach for a LB than under-react!
Given the changes in the rules that CB\'s have in the passing game since last season--I\'m not sure there\'s a CB in this year\'s class worth giving a 1st rounder for.
I don\'t see a true 2 gap DT (ala Wilfork) coming out. I think Patterson from USC is an interesting prospect, but looks like another 1 gap guy and we have several of those. A LB wouldn\'t hurt my feelings, in fact I\'d be pretty happy with anyone but Crowder. What I keep kicking around are 2 questions. 1. What if Barron or Brown freakishly falls to 16? 2. What if Mike Williams falls to 16? I\'d take any of those 3 guys before I\'d take a Thomas Davis. I\'d also rather take the chance that Odell Thurman or Ruud is there in round 2. I\'d still prefer to go with a BPA strategy than take just any linebacker. I\'d even be in favor of swapping places with the Bengals to give them a shot at Davis and pick up a 3rd or 4rth rounder from them. .02 |
|
|