|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Ok. WTF? From NFL.com: Positives: Has a physique with adequate muscle definition, tight waist and hips, good bubble and thick thighs … Solid student athlete who has no problems taking the plays from the board to the field … Spends ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-23-2005, 06:10 PM | #1 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Josh Bullocks - FS - #40
Ok. WTF?
From NFL.com:
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
04-23-2005, 06:17 PM | #2 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 2,540
|
Josh Bullocks - FS - #40
from espn-
He was too inconsistent and isn\'t a complete enough player to gamble on in the first two rounds forget burnett, thurman, justin miller or corey webster all i want to hear is how billy spins this into greatness |
04-23-2005, 06:21 PM | #3 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Josh Bullocks - FS - #40
That pick was very odd. We need a linebacker. Someone please make sense of this? It is nuts. You can\'t tell me that Burnett wasn\'t the pick we should have made here.
Maybe there is a deal in the works - Bullocks and Howard for something? I don\'t get it. I can\'t even come up with anything that makes this pick rational. |
04-23-2005, 06:24 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
Josh Bullocks - FS - #40
I love the 1st pick with Brown.
I don\'t understsand the 2nd pick at all. I suppose they went with the best player avaliable approach. Honestly, I never heard of Josh Bullocks. |
04-23-2005, 06:25 PM | #5 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,020
|
Josh Bullocks - FS - #40
Hasbeen is clueless .......
Anyone believing any Billy Hype , better ask for a kiss .... Dallas is showing how to put players on the defensive side of the ball ..... |
04-23-2005, 06:29 PM | #6 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Josh Bullocks - FS - #40
Josh Bullocks was no where near BPA at that point.
As far as all of this goes, all you guys who wanted to keep Howard, you\'re getting exactly what you wanted. Even if we could trade him now, who would be worth getting? Blah. |
04-23-2005, 06:29 PM | #7 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
Josh Bullocks - FS - #40
Billy, I bet you $100 Bullocks was not BPA at that point. :casstet:
|
04-23-2005, 06:35 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
Josh Bullocks - FS - #40
Damn. Some of you guys need to get off of your emotional trip
Obviously Bullocks was the BPA on the SAINTS\' board. I don\'t agree with it. I\'m just trying to make some damn sense of it. Geez!!!!!!! [Edited on 23/4/2005 by GumboBC] |
04-23-2005, 06:37 PM | #9 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Josh Bullocks - FS - #40
I don\'t think I\'m being emotional. I would like an explanation of this pick that makes it seem even remotely rational. Saying that he was BPA on our board is not an explanation that makes it rational - as I\'d like to know how he got there on our board before I decide that this makes some sense. That was quite simply a terrible pick, as terrible as Stinch or Henderson when we needed a LB.
|
04-23-2005, 06:40 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
Josh Bullocks - FS - #40
All I said was I thought they went with the BPA approach. That\'s the only thing that makes sense to me. Now, whether Bullocks was the BPA is debatable. I know nothing about the dude. Which I CLEARLY stated. |