Schonert to use 2-Read/dump/run for AB

RockyMountainSaint · 04-29-2005, 08:05 PM

4-read/dump/run

Hmmmmmmm,

Maybe that explains the fumbles.

He would have to drop the ball to continue counting on his other hand.

Know i\'m gonna catch hell for this but I couldn\'t resist.

[Edited on 30/4/2005 by RockyMountainSaint]

papz · 04-29-2005, 08:51 PM

I expect one of our tightends will have a breakout year... HOPEFULLY. *fingers-crossed* Denver had Shannon Sharpe... 49ers had Brent Jones... hopefully with this simplified scheme, one of our tightends can make a name for themselves.

shadowdrinker · 04-29-2005, 09:05 PM

If anything...this at the very least shows they are walking into this season with a well thought out plan of attack...

I myself think a two check is a tad few...maybe a 3 would be more effective...but..I do not make Offenses...I just gripe about them...

There is really no reason to think that we cannot run the Division this year...and possibly the NFC...Playoffs or bust...

Even though this is a newer Offense..it is a simplified one...it shouldn\'t be hard for our Veterans to pick it up and run with it...I like the idea of letting Deuce control the majority of the Offense\'s fate....

I still question the Defense..but..have high hopes...the F.A. period was one of the better ones in recent memory...and we actually got big time guys ..not just role players...maybe a reduction of Venturi\'s influence will go a long way towards success this year...

It\'s almost scary how proficiently the team seems to have improved...I just hope it translates to good play on the field...

JOESAM2002 · 04-29-2005, 09:30 PM

He would have to drop the ball to continue counting on his other hand.

\"Now that\'s funny,I don\'t care who you are!\"

saintswhodi · 04-29-2005, 10:16 PM

off the topic...nice avatar whodi!!!!any other amac avatars, or am i gonna have to copy yours? LOL!

I read where Halo said there was some new ones, checked it out and lo and behold, my new favorite Saint. It\'s the only one but the more the merrier Venturi.

RockyMountainSaint · 04-30-2005, 03:59 AM

With the addition of Mayberry and Jammal Brown, we should be able to run an effective screen-pass!!!!

Amen Billy.

How long has this aspect of our offense been lacking?

Seems like since Dalton was here.

[Edited on 30/4/2005 by RockyMountainSaint]

Saint_LB · 04-30-2005, 07:01 AM

If you change the order of the words it would describe something I do on a daily basis...run/read/dump!

natedogg02 · 04-30-2005, 08:34 AM

[quote:3faf3b08de]
4-read/dump/run

Hmmmmmmm,

Maybe that explains the fumbles.

He would have to drop the ball to continue counting on his other hand.

I thought he did alot better last year at holding on to the ball.
Not hard to fumble tho when your getting hit from all angle\'s.
Must be another AB hater.

WhoDat · 04-30-2005, 09:37 AM

I personally would love to see Stinch beat out Gandy at LT.

I never liked the Gandy move in the first place. We paid him a lot when we couldn\'t come to an agreement with Turley b/c we needed a guy and we had already put a lot of money aside. Gandy wasn\'t even the LT that Turley was and he is much older. I thought that was a bad move.

I was surprised in his first year when his play didn\'t hurt us more. It caught up in year 2.

Putting Stinch in at LT and Brown in at RT won\'t necessarily mean our T play get a whole lot better this year. BUT, it would give us a young talented line with a bright future - especially if we can keep them together. And we could restructure or cut Gandy and free up $5 million in cap room immediately.

Danno · 04-30-2005, 09:46 AM

I personally would love to see Stinch beat out Gandy at LT. Gandy wasn\'t even the LT that Turley was and he is much older. I thought that was a bad move.

????
Turley was horrible at LT. He looked worse than Folau.
Gandy in 2007 would be a better LT than Turleys best season.

I\'d love to see Stinch win the spot also. Gandy is aging and if Stinchcomb\'s conditioning reports are accurate, he just may overtake Gandy. If not, both stinch and Gandy would still be better than Turley ever was (at LT).

To his credit, Turley was a good RT, but got flat embarrassed as a LT.

04-29-2005, 08:05 PM	#11
RockyMountainSaint Mmm That Smell! Join Date: Oct 1998 Location: Metairie Terrace Posts: 3,073	Schonert to use 2-Read/dump/run for AB 4-read/dump/run Hmmmmmmm, Maybe that explains the fumbles. He would have to drop the ball to continue counting on his other hand. Know i\'m gonna catch hell for this but I couldn\'t resist. [Edited on 30/4/2005 by RockyMountainSaint]

04-29-2005, 08:51 PM	#12
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,756	Schonert to use 2-Read/dump/run for AB I expect one of our tightends will have a breakout year... HOPEFULLY. fingers-crossed Denver had Shannon Sharpe... 49ers had Brent Jones... hopefully with this simplified scheme, one of our tightends can make a name for themselves.

04-29-2005, 09:05 PM	#13
shadowdrinker Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 517	Schonert to use 2-Read/dump/run for AB If anything...this at the very least shows they are walking into this season with a well thought out plan of attack... I myself think a two check is a tad few...maybe a 3 would be more effective...but..I do not make Offenses...I just gripe about them... There is really no reason to think that we cannot run the Division this year...and possibly the NFC...Playoffs or bust... Even though this is a newer Offense..it is a simplified one...it shouldn\'t be hard for our Veterans to pick it up and run with it...I like the idea of letting Deuce control the majority of the Offense\'s fate.... I still question the Defense..but..have high hopes...the F.A. period was one of the better ones in recent memory...and we actually got big time guys ..not just role players...maybe a reduction of Venturi\'s influence will go a long way towards success this year... It\'s almost scary how proficiently the team seems to have improved...I just hope it translates to good play on the field...
shadowdrinker Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 517

04-29-2005, 09:30 PM	#14
JOESAM2002 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: CRYSTAL BEACH TEXAS Posts: 4,100	Schonert to use 2-Read/dump/run for AB He would have to drop the ball to continue counting on his other hand. \"Now that\'s funny,I don\'t care who you are!\"

04-29-2005, 10:16 PM	#15
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Schonert to use 2-Read/dump/run for AB off the topic...nice avatar whodi!!!!any other amac avatars, or am i gonna have to copy yours? LOL! I read where Halo said there was some new ones, checked it out and lo and behold, my new favorite Saint. It\'s the only one but the more the merrier Venturi.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

04-30-2005, 03:59 AM	#16
RockyMountainSaint Mmm That Smell! Join Date: Oct 1998 Location: Metairie Terrace Posts: 3,073	Schonert to use 2-Read/dump/run for AB With the addition of Mayberry and Jammal Brown, we should be able to run an effective screen-pass!!!! Amen Billy. How long has this aspect of our offense been lacking? Seems like since Dalton was here. [Edited on 30/4/2005 by RockyMountainSaint]

04-30-2005, 07:01 AM	#17
Saint_LB Deuce Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 2,894	Schonert to use 2-Read/dump/run for AB If you change the order of the words it would describe something I do on a daily basis...run/read/dump!
Saint_LB Deuce Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 2,894

04-30-2005, 08:34 AM	#18
natedogg02 100th Post Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 145	Schonert to use 2-Read/dump/run for AB [quote:3faf3b08de] 4-read/dump/run Hmmmmmmm, Maybe that explains the fumbles. He would have to drop the ball to continue counting on his other hand. I thought he did alot better last year at holding on to the ball. Not hard to fumble tho when your getting hit from all angle\'s. Must be another AB hater.
natedogg02 100th Post Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 145

04-30-2005, 09:37 AM	#19
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Schonert to use 2-Read/dump/run for AB I personally would love to see Stinch beat out Gandy at LT. I never liked the Gandy move in the first place. We paid him a lot when we couldn\'t come to an agreement with Turley b/c we needed a guy and we had already put a lot of money aside. Gandy wasn\'t even the LT that Turley was and he is much older. I thought that was a bad move. I was surprised in his first year when his play didn\'t hurt us more. It caught up in year 2. Putting Stinch in at LT and Brown in at RT won\'t necessarily mean our T play get a whole lot better this year. BUT, it would give us a young talented line with a bright future - especially if we can keep them together. And we could restructure or cut Gandy and free up $5 million in cap room immediately.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	\"Excuses, excuses, excuses. ThatÃ¢Â€Â™s all anyone ever makes for the New Orleans SaintsÃ¢Â€Â™ organization.\" - Eric Narcisse \"Being a Saints fan is almost like being addicted to crack,\" he said.[i]\"You know you should stop, but you just can\'t.\"

04-30-2005, 09:46 AM	#20
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,725	Schonert to use 2-Read/dump/run for AB I personally would love to see Stinch beat out Gandy at LT. Gandy wasn\'t even the LT that Turley was and he is much older. I thought that was a bad move. ???? Turley was horrible at LT. He looked worse than Folau. Gandy in 2007 would be a better LT than Turleys best season. I\'d love to see Stinch win the spot also. Gandy is aging and if Stinchcomb\'s conditioning reports are accurate, he just may overtake Gandy. If not, both stinch and Gandy would still be better than Turley ever was (at LT). To his credit, Turley was a good RT, but got flat embarrassed as a LT.