|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; What would you take for him? I would take no less than a 3rd. I may entertain a 4th and a 6th. Trying to get back in the first next year so a 3rd, would probably have to have it ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,126
|
MI Potential Trade
What would you take for him?
I would take no less than a 3rd. I may entertain a 4th and a 6th. Trying to get back in the first next year so a 3rd, would probably have to have it to bundle with more pokey bait. A 2,3,4....is that enough to get back in 1? I would think so. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
5000 POSTS! +
|
Re: MI Potential Trade
Nobody is giving you a third for a player with a year left on his deal,especially with so much work on his body. Ingram suits the Saints but he isnt putting up 1500 yards and is no Barry Sanders
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,126
|
Re: MI Potential Trade
Originally Posted by lee909
![]()
And that is why I am asking. So a 4th and a 6th, or maybe a 4th and a conditional. I would entertain that as well. If we are going to get back in the 1st going to need to start hoarding picks from somewhere. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
5000 POSTS! +
|
Re: MI Potential Trade
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Site Donor 2018
|
Re: MI Potential Trade
Only thing worst than Sean Payton & the Mickster trading first and second round picks to select Ingram in 2011 would be trading him in the midst of a likely Title Run...
He's too valuable, too integrated to the current success of this team. As stated on the other thread, let him play out his contract this year and contribute to a Title... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,126
|
Re: MI Potential Trade
Originally Posted by jeanpierre
![]()
Title run? I'm looking at dynasty run. Have to see out more than 2ft in front of your face to make that reality. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,472
|
Re: MI Potential Trade
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,635
|
Re: MI Potential Trade
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana
Posts: 5,893
|
Re: MI Potential Trade
Not saying a trade is not possible( look at Graham) but Ingram's running, blocking and pass catching has gotten better over the years. He was stupid in taking a known ban substance and they all know what they are but he still holds high value on our O.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,472
|
Re: MI Potential Trade
He didn't intentionally take a known banned substance. According to four separate Saints players (including Zach Strief) a trace amount of a substance picked up from a tainted supplement that is approved by the league was found in his sample. And according to his agent the banned substance wasn't even one recognized as "performance enhancing" and could be taken with a Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE) ... (ie. fertility meds, hair growth meds, etc.).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/89479-mi-potential-trade.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 07-18-2018 09:18 PM | 12 |
MI Potential Trade | This thread | Refback | 07-18-2018 09:06 PM | 5 |