MI Potential Trade

Beastmode · 07-18-2018, 09:00 PM

What would you take for him?

I would take no less than a 3rd. I may entertain a 4th and a 6th. Trying to get back in the first next year so a 3rd, would probably have to have it to bundle with more pokey bait.

A 2,3,4....is that enough to get back in 1? I would think so.

lee909 · 07-18-2018, 09:12 PM

Nobody is giving you a third for a player with a year left on his deal,especially with so much work on his body. Ingram suits the Saints but he isnt putting up 1500 yards and is no Barry Sanders

Beastmode · 07-18-2018, 10:30 PM

Originally Posted by lee909

Nobody is giving you a third for a player with a year left on his deal,especially with so much work on his body. Ingram suits the Saints but he isnt putting up 1500 yards and is no Barry Sanders

And that is why I am asking. So a 4th and a 6th, or maybe a 4th and a conditional. I would entertain that as well. If we are going to get back in the 1st going to need to start hoarding picks from somewhere.

jeanpierre · 07-18-2018, 10:34 PM

Only thing worst than Sean Payton & the Mickster trading first and second round picks to select Ingram in 2011 would be trading him in the midst of a likely Title Run...

He's too valuable, too integrated to the current success of this team. As stated on the other thread, let him play out his contract this year and contribute to a Title...

Beastmode · 07-18-2018, 10:37 PM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

Only thing worst than Sean Payton & the Mickster trading first and second round picks to select Ingram in 2011 would be trading him in the midst of a likely Title Run...

He's too valuable, too integrated to the current success of this team. As stated on the other thread, let him play out his contract this year and contribute to a Title...

Title run? I'm looking at dynasty run. Have to see out more than 2ft in front of your face to make that reality.

lee909 · 07-18-2018, 10:37 PM

Originally Posted by Beastmode

And that is why I am asking. So a 4th and a 6th, or maybe a 4th and a conditional. I would entertain that as well. If we are going to get back in the 1st going to need to start hoarding picks from somewhere.

I wouldn't trade him.
Not for picks i at least.

halloween 65 · 07-19-2018, 06:50 AM

Not saying a trade is not possible( look at Graham) but Ingram's running, blocking and pass catching has gotten better over the years. He was stupid in taking a known ban substance and they all know what they are but he still holds high value on our O.

AsylumGuido · 07-19-2018, 07:37 AM

Originally Posted by halloween 65

Not saying a trade is not possible( look at Graham) but Ingram's running, blocking and pass catching has gotten better over the years. He was stupid in taking a known ban substance and they all know what they are but he still holds high value on our O.

He didn't intentionally take a known banned substance. According to four separate Saints players (including Zach Strief) a trace amount of a substance picked up from a tainted supplement that is approved by the league was found in his sample. And according to his agent the banned substance wasn't even one recognized as "performance enhancing" and could be taken with a Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE) ... (ie. fertility meds, hair growth meds, etc.).

AsylumGuido · 07-19-2018, 07:50 AM

Originally Posted by Beastmode

What would you take for him?

I would take no less than a 3rd. I may entertain a 4th and a 6th. Trying to get back in the first next year so a 3rd, would probably have to have it to bundle with more pokey bait.

A 2,3,4....is that enough to get back in 1? I would think so.

Why are you so obsessed with trading Ingram? It is beyond stupid to weaken our roster this season, when we have a very legitimate shot at winning it all, hoping to somehow move into the tail end of the 1st round next year and pick up a player that is not guaranteed to have any immediate impact whatsoever ... if ever.

AsylumGuido · 07-19-2018, 07:53 AM

Originally Posted by Beastmode

Title run? I'm looking at dynasty run. Have to see out more than 2ft in front of your face to make that reality.

And one pick will suddenly build a dynasty?

07-18-2018, 09:00 PM	#1
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126	MI Potential Trade What would you take for him? I would take no less than a 3rd. I may entertain a 4th and a 6th. Trying to get back in the first next year so a 3rd, would probably have to have it to bundle with more pokey bait. A 2,3,4....is that enough to get back in 1? I would think so.
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126

07-18-2018, 09:12 PM	#2
lee909 Site Donor 2015 Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Watford England Posts: 8,716 Blog Entries: 1	Re: MI Potential Trade Nobody is giving you a third for a player with a year left on his deal,especially with so much work on his body. Ingram suits the Saints but he isnt putting up 1500 yards and is no Barry Sanders

07-18-2018, 10:30 PM	#3
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126	Re: MI Potential Trade Originally Posted by lee909 Nobody is giving you a third for a player with a year left on his deal,especially with so much work on his body. Ingram suits the Saints but he isnt putting up 1500 yards and is no Barry Sanders And that is why I am asking. So a 4th and a 6th, or maybe a 4th and a conditional. I would entertain that as well. If we are going to get back in the 1st going to need to start hoarding picks from somewhere.
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126

07-18-2018, 10:34 PM	#4
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Re: MI Potential Trade Only thing worst than Sean Payton & the Mickster trading first and second round picks to select Ingram in 2011 would be trading him in the midst of a likely Title Run... He's too valuable, too integrated to the current success of this team. As stated on the other thread, let him play out his contract this year and contribute to a Title... jnormand, RailBoss, Rsanders24 and 1 others like this.

07-18-2018, 10:37 PM	#5
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126	Re: MI Potential Trade Originally Posted by jeanpierre Only thing worst than Sean Payton & the Mickster trading first and second round picks to select Ingram in 2011 would be trading him in the midst of a likely Title Run... He's too valuable, too integrated to the current success of this team. As stated on the other thread, let him play out his contract this year and contribute to a Title... Title run? I'm looking at dynasty run. Have to see out more than 2ft in front of your face to make that reality. RailBoss and foreverfan like this.
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

07-19-2018, 06:50 AM	#7
halloween 65 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana Posts: 5,893	Re: MI Potential Trade Not saying a trade is not possible( look at Graham) but Ingram's running, blocking and pass catching has gotten better over the years. He was stupid in taking a known ban substance and they all know what they are but he still holds high value on our O. foreverfan likes this.

07-19-2018, 07:37 AM	#8
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 24,391	Re: MI Potential Trade Originally Posted by halloween 65 Not saying a trade is not possible( look at Graham) but Ingram's running, blocking and pass catching has gotten better over the years. He was stupid in taking a known ban substance and they all know what they are but he still holds high value on our O. He didn't intentionally take a known banned substance. According to four separate Saints players (including Zach Strief) a trace amount of a substance picked up from a tainted supplement that is approved by the league was found in his sample. And according to his agent the banned substance wasn't even one recognized as "performance enhancing" and could be taken with a Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE) ... (ie. fertility meds, hair growth meds, etc.).

07-19-2018, 07:50 AM	#9
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 24,391	Re: MI Potential Trade Originally Posted by Beastmode What would you take for him? I would take no less than a 3rd. I may entertain a 4th and a 6th. Trying to get back in the first next year so a 3rd, would probably have to have it to bundle with more pokey bait. A 2,3,4....is that enough to get back in 1? I would think so. Why are you so obsessed with trading Ingram? It is beyond stupid to weaken our roster this season, when we have a very legitimate shot at winning it all, hoping to somehow move into the tail end of the 1st round next year and pick up a player that is not guaranteed to have any immediate impact whatsoever ... if ever. K Major likes this.

07-19-2018, 07:53 AM	#10
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 24,391	Re: MI Potential Trade Originally Posted by Beastmode Title run? I'm looking at dynasty run. Have to see out more than 2ft in front of your face to make that reality. And one pick will suddenly build a dynasty?

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/89479-mi-potential-trade.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	07-18-2018 09:18 PM	12
MI Potential Trade	This thread	Refback	07-18-2018 09:06 PM	4