Originally Posted by spkb25 (Post 810886)

This has nothing to do with being positive or negative. Your problem is when people post their opinion you don't offer a constructive rebuttal. Instead you go to "old faithful", and tell them how they're not a coach, they're not on the staff, how do they know, etc.

There's nothing constructive about that. It is actually a negative based post by you without an ounce of supporting facts or details. In short it is useless.

If you want to make positive post while ignoring anything negative, more power to you. Right now, however, you're being accused of posting the same negative posts lacking any supporting information against the other posters. Maybe either offer something constructive in terms of why you support a specific player (as that may change someone's opinion) or say nothing and stick to positive post only.

Originally Posted by spkb25 (Post 810887)

Yes, but you missed my praise of the TB selection, huh. Or my consistent praise of Davenport's play. I defended their selection of Ram and Peat.so no, I criticize what I feel is deserved. If I'm wrong I admit it.

Originally Posted by spkb25 (Post 810888)

Draft picks are risky business

Originally Posted by spkb25 (Post 810889)

Old faithful...

Originally Posted by spkb25 (Post 810889)

Old faithful...

Originally Posted by The Dude (Post 810908)

I disagree. By Guidos logic the boards purpose is for us to only read what he posts and agree with everything he says.
In his mind it should be structured in a way that each post he makes is like an article with a small comment section at the bottom. Like the articles from TMZ.
The comments would probably be limited to 10-12 characters so about the only thing you have room to write is
“You’re right”
“Good point”
You are so smart”
“16-0”
You get the point.

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 810915)

You're wrong.
Bad point.
You're not so smart.

19-0 Baby!

:bng:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 810916)

I've missed you this off-season. Glad to see you back!

:D

Originally Posted by nola_swammi (Post 810827)

J.T. Gray did not out play Jamerson nor did he outplay him in S.T.

Originally Posted by K Major (Post 811067)

Here is a quick read on Gray. 6 foot, listed as a hybrid LB/hybrid safety. Fast, strong & can play the 6th slot at linebacker (played LB @ Miss St). Maybe he outplayed Stupar on special teams, no?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.the...4bf38.amp.html

Originally Posted by jeanpierre (Post 811148)

Payton's comments knocking back at Stupar's outstanding play against the Rams has now led me to believe that Payton didn't want Stupar no matter what he'd done...

Originally Posted by jeanpierre (Post 811148)

Maybe Major, but do you remember a stand-out play in the PreSeason from Gray?!?

Originally Posted by K Major (Post 811158)

No sir, however I'm not in camp/film room & practices like the coaches are 24/7. We only get a sample size of what goes on each day.

I gotta trust the process ... *welp* :(.

Originally Posted by dizzle88 (Post 811151)

The one play I remember from Gray was the 40 yard PI that got called on him when he got beat and just tackled the guy before the ball was there.

Solid decision Payton, congrats.