Corresponding Move For Gillislee, Saints Release Stupar

AsylumGuido · 09-03-2018, 12:38 PM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

You're right, but this move still sucks balls - Stupar has always balled-out even with a perceived limitation in physical skills to his peers...

Rather have 49 Stupars, Brees, Kamara, Lutz and a Morstead though...

We need Stupar week three. We should be fine without him against the Bucs and Browns.

Utah_Saint · 09-03-2018, 01:43 PM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

We need Stupar week three. We should be fine without him against the Bucs and Browns.

The Falcons linebackers have been terrible this preseason. He'd be a great pick up for them. And if they do it now, he could play against us by week 3.

The Dude · 09-03-2018, 01:53 PM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

I believe Stupar will be back. He knows it's just a roster number move. I'll bet that an agreement is in place for him to return. Loomis works these kinds of deals all the time. Just remember all those player that bounce on and off the roster several times during the season.

B.S. Stupar has significant playing time in regular season games. He’s not just going to step aside. Another team will sign him any minute. This is as dumb a comment as you have ever made. Seriously you can’t bring yourself to disagree with anything the Saints do, no matter how asinine.

jnormand · 09-03-2018, 12:20 PM

To be totally honest, I'm pissed off. If Ingram wouldn't have gotten in trouble than we wouldn't have needed to sign Gillislee and wouldn't need to cut Stupe. Regardless, they can't find another player to cut? Really? This guy is a teamer. He goes balls to the wall every play. And they cut him and keep ****in players who we don't need?!

jeanpierre · 09-03-2018, 12:33 PM

Originally Posted by jnormand

To be totally honest, I'm pissed off. If Ingram wouldn't have gotten in trouble than we wouldn't have needed to sign Gillislee and wouldn't need to cut Stupe. Regardless, they can't find another player to cut? Really? This guy is a teamer. He goes balls to the wall every play. And they cut him and keep ****in players who we don't need?!

Had that thought, but they still have to release someone (i.e. Gillislee, Edmunds, Gray) when Ingram comes off suspension...

The Dude · 09-03-2018, 02:32 PM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

Had that thought, but they still have to release someone (i.e. Gillislee, Edmunds, Gray) when Ingram comes off suspension...

At least by that time the staff will have had four regular season games to assess which players are expendable.

Lord_Saint83 · 09-03-2018, 12:24 PM

Why didnt they just cut klein. He's been stinking it up since he's gotten here.

Utah_Saint · 09-03-2018, 12:33 PM

Originally Posted by Lord_Saint83

Why didnt they just cut klein. He's been stinking it up since he's gotten here.

It's because of Klein's stupid backloaded contract. It's cheaper to keep him.

Lord_Saint83 · 09-03-2018, 01:21 PM

Originally Posted by Utah_Saint

It's because of Klein's stupid backloaded contract. It's cheaper to keep him.

That never stopped loomis before

AsylumGuido · 09-03-2018, 01:23 PM

Originally Posted by Lord_Saint83

That never stopped loomis before

Only in extreme conditions.

09-03-2018, 12:38 PM	#1
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,759	Re: Corresponding Move For Gillislee, Saints Release Stupar Originally Posted by jeanpierre You're right, but this move still sucks balls - Stupar has always balled-out even with a perceived limitation in physical skills to his peers... Rather have 49 Stupars, Brees, Kamara, Lutz and a Morstead though... We need Stupar week three. We should be fine without him against the Bucs and Browns. Utah_Saint likes this.

09-03-2018, 01:43 PM	#2
Utah_Saint Site Donor 2019 Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah Posts: 3,521	Re: Corresponding Move For Gillislee, Saints Release Stupar Originally Posted by AsylumGuido We need Stupar week three. We should be fine without him against the Bucs and Browns. The Falcons linebackers have been terrible this preseason. He'd be a great pick up for them. And if they do it now, he could play against us by week 3.

09-03-2018, 01:53 PM	#3
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,065	Re: Corresponding Move For Gillislee, Saints Release Stupar Originally Posted by AsylumGuido I believe Stupar will be back. He knows it's just a roster number move. I'll bet that an agreement is in place for him to return. Loomis works these kinds of deals all the time. Just remember all those player that bounce on and off the roster several times during the season. B.S. Stupar has significant playing time in regular season games. He’s not just going to step aside. Another team will sign him any minute. This is as dumb a comment as you have ever made. Seriously you can’t bring yourself to disagree with anything the Saints do, no matter how asinine.
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,065

09-03-2018, 12:20 PM	#4
jnormand 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: The Free State of Idaho Posts: 5,781	Re: Corresponding Move For Gillislee, Saints Release Stupar To be totally honest, I'm pissed off. If Ingram wouldn't have gotten in trouble than we wouldn't have needed to sign Gillislee and wouldn't need to cut Stupe. Regardless, they can't find another player to cut? Really? This guy is a teamer. He goes balls to the wall every play. And they cut him and keep ****in players who we don't need?! jeanpierre, frydaddy and CharityMike like this.

09-03-2018, 12:33 PM	#5
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Re: Corresponding Move For Gillislee, Saints Release Stupar Originally Posted by jnormand To be totally honest, I'm pissed off. If Ingram wouldn't have gotten in trouble than we wouldn't have needed to sign Gillislee and wouldn't need to cut Stupe. Regardless, they can't find another player to cut? Really? This guy is a teamer. He goes balls to the wall every play. And they cut him and keep **in players who we don't need?! Had that thought, but they still have to release someone (i.e. Gillislee, Edmunds, Gray) when Ingram comes off suspension...**

09-03-2018, 02:32 PM	#6
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,065	Re: Corresponding Move For Gillislee, Saints Release Stupar Originally Posted by jeanpierre Had that thought, but they still have to release someone (i.e. Gillislee, Edmunds, Gray) when Ingram comes off suspension... At least by that time the staff will have had four regular season games to assess which players are expendable.
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,065

09-03-2018, 12:24 PM	#7
Lord_Saint83 100% Blunt Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Saint Gabriel, La Posts: 2,754	Re: Corresponding Move For Gillislee, Saints Release Stupar Why didnt they just cut klein. He's been stinking it up since he's gotten here. Papa Voodoo, Rugby Saint II and frydaddy like this.

09-03-2018, 01:21 PM	#9
Lord_Saint83 100% Blunt Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Saint Gabriel, La Posts: 2,754	Re: Corresponding Move For Gillislee, Saints Release Stupar Originally Posted by Utah_Saint It's because of Klein's stupid backloaded contract. It's cheaper to keep him. That never stopped loomis before spkb25 likes this.

09-03-2018, 01:23 PM	#10
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,759	Re: Corresponding Move For Gillislee, Saints Release Stupar Originally Posted by Lord_Saint83 That never stopped loomis before Only in extreme conditions.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/89998-corresponding-move-gillislee-saints-release-stupar.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Corresponding Move For Gillislee, Saints Release Stupar	This thread	Refback	09-03-2018 12:21 PM	2