![]() |
Re: Commissioner has authority to take action over Rams-Saints outcome, in theory
Quote:
|
Re: Commissioner has authority to take action over Rams-Saints outcome, in theory
Quote:
Before you go knotting your panties, or tucking your pee-pee and doing a dance; you may want to fall back and gather your thoughts.. You are a bit of a destination fu3ked in the logic department. By all accounts, it was the Referees that screwed you, not the Saints. Whats next on your scribbled napkin list, join the NFL Referees forums and comment? Don't cut your self short, we certainly do feel for you... pretty much the same way we felt about you in 2009. BTW, you may want to try reading and save your self the embarrassment of jackassing around the interwebz and tainting your family name. https://vikingswire.usatoday.com/201...-favre-was-qb/ Shame on you for making me say all of this, I am trying to be a better person. |
Re: Commissioner has authority to take action over Rams-Saints outcome, in theory
All this talk from the supposed Vikings fans ... I think it's just Internet tough guys going for clickbait.
I have many friends and family that are Vikings fans. I live in a Vikings market. I have yet to catch any of this resentful you-had-it-coming attitude. Most fans would know not to compare apples and oranges. |
Re: Commissioner has authority to take action over Rams-Saints outcome, in theory
|
Re: Commissioner has authority to take action over Rams-Saints outcome, in theory
RULE SUMMARY VIEW OFFICIAL RULE
USE OF THE HELMET It is a foul if a player lowers his head to initiate and make contact with his helmet against an opponent. Note: The tackle box no longer exists once the ball leaves the tackle box. Penalty: Loss of 15 yards. If the foul is by the defense, it is also an automatic first down. The player may be disqualified. The NFL pays meticulous attention to every detail that goes into putting on a professional football game — ALL LIES AS IN SUPER BOWL LIE!! |
Re: Commissioner has authority to take action over Rams-Saints outcome, in theory
|
Re: Commissioner has authority to take action over Rams-Saints outcome, in theory
I see the butt hurt Vikings troll joined B&G just this month to make that one comment.
Sad. |
Re: Commissioner has authority to take action over Rams-Saints outcome, in theory
Quote:
I can give you a little homework. How many of the Saints "offensive" opposing players were injured and had to be removed from games during the 2009-10 season? As a little help I can tell you there were only two I am aware of and they suffered non-contact injuries. Either the Saints' defense was extremely bad at "intentionally injuring" opposing players or there was never any intention of injuring opposing players. Where did the Saints rank in penalties for roughing the passer and unnecessary roughness during the 2009-10 season? You find out with a little research that they were ranked in the bottom half of the league. Not what would be expected under a "bounty" system promoting "intentionally injuring" opposing players has Goodell proposed, huh? What was Favre's take on his supposedly being targeted with a "bounty"? You'll find out by reading his book that he didn't feel that the Saints did anything wrong and that the Vikings had the exact same type of defensive performance pool going on themselves. Once again, come back and play! :D |
Re: Commissioner has authority to take action over Rams-Saints outcome, in theory
Quote:
Dear blanket come join the party |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com