Commissioner has authority to take action over Rams-Saints outcome, in theory

AsylumGuido · 01-25-2019, 01:43 PM

Originally Posted by Hiyeena

Funny you Saint fans didn't feel for the Vikings when your team screwed them in the playoffs. League said it blew three calls that weren't called. One of them would have given Minn first down on 15 yard line instead of and interception. And bounty gate was the result of these late hits and dirty play. You have nothing to ***** about you were already awarded a superbowl game that you didn't deserve. So quit crying.

Where did you run away to? If you want to come here to talk **** why not stick around to get the real story? Are you afraid your comfort blanket excuse of some sort of "bounty" changing the outcome of that game back in 2010 will come crashing down?

I can give you a little homework.

How many of the Saints "offensive" opposing players were injured and had to be removed from games during the 2009-10 season? As a little help I can tell you there were only two I am aware of and they suffered non-contact injuries. Either the Saints' defense was extremely bad at "intentionally injuring" opposing players or there was never any intention of injuring opposing players.

Where did the Saints rank in penalties for roughing the passer and unnecessary roughness during the 2009-10 season? You find out with a little research that they were ranked in the bottom half of the league. Not what would be expected under a "bounty" system promoting "intentionally injuring" opposing players has Goodell proposed, huh?

What was Favre's take on his supposedly being targeted with a "bounty"? You'll find out by reading his book that he didn't feel that the Saints did anything wrong and that the Vikings had the exact same type of defensive performance pool going on themselves.

Once again, come back and play!

01-25-2019, 01:43 PM	#30
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,953	Re: Commissioner has authority to take action over Rams-Saints outcome, in theory Originally Posted by Hiyeena Funny you Saint fans didn't feel for the Vikings when your team screwed them in the playoffs. League said it blew three calls that weren't called. One of them would have given Minn first down on 15 yard line instead of and interception. And bounty gate was the result of these late hits and dirty play. You have nothing to *** about you were already awarded a superbowl game that you didn't deserve. So quit crying. Where did you run away to? If you want to come here to talk why not stick around to get the real story? Are you afraid your comfort blanket excuse of some sort of "bounty" changing the outcome of that game back in 2010 will come crashing down? I can give you a little homework. How many of the Saints "offensive" opposing players were injured and had to be removed from games during the 2009-10 season? As a little help I can tell you there were only two I am aware of and they suffered non-contact injuries. Either the Saints' defense was extremely bad at "intentionally injuring" opposing players or there was never any intention of injuring opposing players. Where did the Saints rank in penalties for roughing the passer and unnecessary roughness during the 2009-10 season? You find out with a little research that they were ranked in the bottom half of the league. Not what would be expected under a "bounty" system promoting "intentionally injuring" opposing players has Goodell proposed, huh? What was Favre's take on his supposedly being targeted with a "bounty"?** You'll find out by reading his book that he didn't feel that the Saints did anything wrong and that the Vikings had the exact same type of defensive performance pool going on themselves. Once again, come back and play! Danno, st thomas, dam1953 and 2 others like this.
	“The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” — Winston Churchill