Frank D'Amico files lawsuit against Goodell

01-22-2019, 04:25 PM

Originally Posted by TheOak

Bad look? Nahhhh, a bad look is the c0cksuck3r in the OP calling Sean Payton to apologize but never publicly apologizing to the New Orleans Saints fan-base. A bad look is openly admitting that you know something was wrong and having the power to make it right but sitting on your d1ckbeaters. A bad look is slamming a team for a 'safety issue' then allowing a no-call on a 'safety issue'.. There are a lot of bad looks about this, I dont see filing suit as one of them.

I am tired of my team being the leagues abuse doll.

Hey look, I think those are bad looks too. But cmon man, your telling me those bad calls don't go our way sometimes? Those bad calls work for and against everyone at some point.

So, yeah, Frank D'Amico filing a lawsuit for public gain is a bad look for me. And also, I was brought up to believe that you don't counter a "bad look" with another one. Take the high road and leave that for the bottom feeders.

dam1953 · 01-22-2019, 04:34 PM

Originally Posted by 73Saint

Hey look, I think those are bad looks too. But cmon man, your telling me those bad calls don't go our way sometimes? Those bad calls work for and against everyone at some point.

So, yeah, Frank D'Amico filing a lawsuit for public gain is a bad look for me. And also, I was brought up to believe that you don't counter a "bad look" with another one. Take the high road and leave that for the bottom feeders.

I agree completely that taking the high road is always the best approach........
except when some one does something as agrigeous as stealing a Super Bowl appearance from you. Then you’re justified in kicking them in the nuts...hard enough so that they never do it to you again. Hard enough so they never think of doing it again, ever. Hard enough so that sexual reassignment surgery crosses their mind.

73Saint · 01-22-2019, 04:36 PM

Originally Posted by dam1953

I agree completely that taking the high road is always the best approach........
except when some one does something as agrigeous as stealing a Super Bowl appearance from you. Then you’re justified in kicking them in the nuts...hard enough so that they never do it to you again. Hard enough so they never think of doing it again, ever. Hard enough so that sexual reassignment surgery crosses their mind.

I get your frustrations. I guess we'll just agree to disagree. I'm so freaking pissed but to me, lashing out only makes it worse.

TheOak · 01-22-2019, 04:43 PM

Originally Posted by 73Saint

I get your frustrations. I guess we'll just agree to disagree. I'm so freaking pissed but to me, lashing out only makes it worse.

Let me be clear... I am not asking for damages. I am not asking for anything above and beyond. The leagues bylaws have a clause just for this situation and we are not talking about a holding or off-sides call. This was a defenseless receiver, pass interference, and helmet to helmet...

Forcing Goddell to use the powers granted him is hardly a low road expectation.

I am willing to bet good money they didn't call the penalties just to force the game into overtime so the league could have higher ratings and more exciting games. Well they f5cked up.

frydaddy · 01-22-2019, 05:29 PM

Originally Posted by dam1953

I agree completely that taking the high road is always the best approach........
except when some one does something as agrigeous as stealing a Super Bowl appearance from you. Then you’re justified in kicking them in the nuts...hard enough so that they never do it to you again. Hard enough so they never think of doing it again, ever. Hard enough so that sexual reassignment surgery crosses their mind.

I agree with every word of this. When your enemy only ever fights dirty, you fight them at their level. The high road doesn't work under these sort of circumstances.

73Saint · 01-22-2019, 05:35 PM

Originally Posted by frydaddy

I agree with every word of this. When your enemy only ever fights dirty, you fight them at their level. The high road doesn't work under these sort of circumstances.

Um, so, the low road does? Negative.

vpheughan · 01-22-2019, 06:12 PM

YET; NFL looking into report of laser use at Tom Brady..........REMEMBER, TAKE THAT HIGH ROAD, A LASER COULD CAUSE HARM, WE WOULDN'T WANT THAT NOW WOULD WE?

burningmetal · 01-22-2019, 06:16 PM

I've already signed the petition that's out there, calling for Goodell to use his authority to either go back to the point where the foul occurred, or replay the whole game.

I don't really care if it were the Saints or any other team. What happened is ridiculous. Do I expect Goodell will do anything? Of course not. But you have to put pressure on the league if you want any positives changes to be made, if not now, then in the future.

The only way to make the league do ANYTHING, is to get enough people demanding change, and also making their wallets hurt. Everyone has the right to be angry about what happened, but as far as effectiveness, anger is useless. You have to take tangible steps.

Screw all the talk about being "petty" to make Goodell use a rule that he HAS the power to use. If the rule exists to be able to correct an incredible injustice, not just some bang-bang play, then what better time to use it than now?

If you are someone reading this, right now, and you think it's pointless or petty, let me ask you a simple question: Why? The rule exists for a reason, no? So use it.

vpheughan · 01-22-2019, 06:35 PM

PRECISELY! WHY DOES THE RULE EXIST?

SHINE AS MUCH LIGHT AS YOU POSSIBLE ON THE NFL'S SEEMING APATHY TOWARD THEIR OWN RULES!

THEY THEN TURN AROUND AND LAUNCH AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE USE OF A LASER ON TOM BRADY?

WHY?

BECAUSE IT'S MORE "UNSAFE" THAN HELMET TO HELMET CONTACT OR A FORE ARM TO THE FACE MASK?.

IF IT WALKS LIKE A DUCK, QUACKS LIKE A DUCK........

(SLOWLY FADE TO BLACK WITH "TAINTED LOVE" PLAYING)

SUPER BOWL LIE!!!

dskyyksd · 01-22-2019, 06:36 PM

It's a waste of time to take the NFL to court over the outcomes of games. It's already been ruled in court that the NFL has no obligation to provide a fair outcome to a contest.

01-22-2019, 04:25 PM	#11
Threaded by 73Saint 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: NOLA Posts: 2,336 Rating: (0 votes - average) Originally Posted by TheOak Bad look? Nahhhh, a bad look is the c0cksuck3r in the OP calling Sean Payton to apologize but never publicly apologizing to the New Orleans Saints fan-base. A bad look is openly admitting that you know something was wrong and having the power to make it right but sitting on your d1ckbeaters. A bad look is slamming a team for a 'safety issue' then allowing a no-call on a 'safety issue'.. There are a lot of bad looks about this, I dont see filing suit as one of them. I am tired of my team being the leagues abuse doll. Hey look, I think those are bad looks too. But cmon man, your telling me those bad calls don't go our way sometimes? Those bad calls work for and against everyone at some point. So, yeah, Frank D'Amico filing a lawsuit for public gain is a bad look for me. And also, I was brought up to believe that you don't counter a "bad look" with another one. Take the high road and leave that for the bottom feeders.
Views: 7148

01-22-2019, 04:34 PM	#12
dam1953 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: SW Ohio Posts: 4,645	Re: Frank D'Amico files lawsuit against Goodell Originally Posted by 73Saint Hey look, I think those are bad looks too. But cmon man, your telling me those bad calls don't go our way sometimes? Those bad calls work for and against everyone at some point. So, yeah, Frank D'Amico filing a lawsuit for public gain is a bad look for me. And also, I was brought up to believe that you don't counter a "bad look" with another one. Take the high road and leave that for the bottom feeders. I agree completely that taking the high road is always the best approach........ except when some one does something as agrigeous as stealing a Super Bowl appearance from you. Then you’re justified in kicking them in the nuts...hard enough so that they never do it to you again. Hard enough so they never think of doing it again, ever. Hard enough so that sexual reassignment surgery crosses their mind. OldMaid, frydaddy, darksoul35 and 1 others like this.

01-22-2019, 04:36 PM	#13
73Saint 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: NOLA Posts: 2,336	Re: Frank D'Amico files lawsuit against Goodell Originally Posted by dam1953 I agree completely that taking the high road is always the best approach........ except when some one does something as agrigeous as stealing a Super Bowl appearance from you. Then you’re justified in kicking them in the nuts...hard enough so that they never do it to you again. Hard enough so they never think of doing it again, ever. Hard enough so that sexual reassignment surgery crosses their mind. I get your frustrations. I guess we'll just agree to disagree. I'm so freaking pissed but to me, lashing out only makes it worse.

01-22-2019, 04:43 PM	#14
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,027	Re: Frank D'Amico files lawsuit against Goodell Originally Posted by 73Saint I get your frustrations. I guess we'll just agree to disagree. I'm so freaking pissed but to me, lashing out only makes it worse. Let me be clear... I am not asking for damages. I am not asking for anything above and beyond. The leagues bylaws have a clause just for this situation and we are not talking about a holding or off-sides call. This was a defenseless receiver, pass interference, and helmet to helmet... Forcing Goddell to use the powers granted him is hardly a low road expectation. I am willing to bet good money they didn't call the penalties just to force the game into overtime so the league could have higher ratings and more exciting games. Well they f5cked up. SmashMouth and frydaddy like this.
	It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. ~ Henry David Thoreau

01-22-2019, 05:29 PM	#15
frydaddy 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Lafayette Posts: 1,950 Blog Entries: 1	Re: Frank D'Amico files lawsuit against Goodell Originally Posted by dam1953 I agree completely that taking the high road is always the best approach........ except when some one does something as agrigeous as stealing a Super Bowl appearance from you. Then you’re justified in kicking them in the nuts...hard enough so that they never do it to you again. Hard enough so they never think of doing it again, ever. Hard enough so that sexual reassignment surgery crosses their mind. I agree with every word of this. When your enemy only ever fights dirty, you fight them at their level. The high road doesn't work under these sort of circumstances.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

01-22-2019, 05:35 PM	#16
73Saint 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: NOLA Posts: 2,336	Re: Frank D'Amico files lawsuit against Goodell Originally Posted by frydaddy I agree with every word of this. When your enemy only ever fights dirty, you fight them at their level. The high road doesn't work under these sort of circumstances. Um, so, the low road does? Negative.

01-22-2019, 06:12 PM	#17
vpheughan 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 4,525	Re: Frank D'Amico files lawsuit against Goodell *YET; NFL looking into report of laser use at Tom Brady..........REMEMBER, TAKE THAT HIGH ROAD, A LASER COULD CAUSE HARM, WE WOULDN'T WANT THAT NOW WOULD WE?*
vpheughan 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 4,525

01-22-2019, 06:16 PM	#18
burningmetal 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 3,923 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Frank D'Amico files lawsuit against Goodell I've already signed the petition that's out there, calling for Goodell to use his authority to either go back to the point where the foul occurred, or replay the whole game. I don't really care if it were the Saints or any other team. What happened is ridiculous. Do I expect Goodell will do anything? Of course not. But you have to put pressure on the league if you want any positives changes to be made, if not now, then in the future. The only way to make the league do ANYTHING, is to get enough people demanding change, and also making their wallets hurt. Everyone has the right to be angry about what happened, but as far as effectiveness, anger is useless. You have to take tangible steps. Screw all the talk about being "petty" to make Goodell use a rule that he HAS the power to use. If the rule exists to be able to correct an incredible injustice, not just some bang-bang play, then what better time to use it than now? If you are someone reading this, right now, and you think it's pointless or petty, let me ask you a simple question: Why? The rule exists for a reason, no? So use it.
	If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.

01-22-2019, 06:35 PM	#19
vpheughan 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 4,525	Re: Frank D'Amico files lawsuit against Goodell PRECISELY! WHY DOES THE RULE EXIST? SHINE AS MUCH LIGHT AS YOU POSSIBLE ON THE NFL'S SEEMING APATHY TOWARD THEIR OWN RULES! THEY THEN TURN AROUND AND LAUNCH AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE USE OF A LASER ON TOM BRADY? WHY? BECAUSE IT'S MORE "UNSAFE" THAN HELMET TO HELMET CONTACT OR A FORE ARM TO THE FACE MASK?. IF IT WALKS LIKE A DUCK, QUACKS LIKE A DUCK........ (SLOWLY FADE TO BLACK WITH "TAINTED LOVE" PLAYING) SUPER BOWL LIE!!! darksoul35 likes this.
vpheughan 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 4,525

01-22-2019, 06:36 PM	#20
dskyyksd Registered Join Date: Jan 2018 Posts: 73	Re: Frank D'Amico files lawsuit against Goodell It's a waste of time to take the NFL to court over the outcomes of games. It's already been ruled in court that the NFL has no obligation to provide a fair outcome to a contest.
dskyyksd Registered Join Date: Jan 2018 Posts: 73