Funny thing about Blake-Brooks season

saintswhodi · 07-21-2005, 09:09 PM

Originally Posted by spkb25

but brooks' wasn't handed a playoff team. he was handed a team who could be headed to the playoffs. also williams was hurt after the 10th game in the season and didnt play again, which means our best rusher was and christ am i right on this terry allen. so brooks has as his rusher terrry allen and blake had ricky who that year had already rushed for 1000 yards in 10 games. dude are you honestly going to tell me that that doesn't matter. because we are talking about that year no.

bro i really do understand your criticism but man trent dilfer is average. are you saying that brooks is no better then trent dilfer. please don't tell me that

Well, some on here are under the impression that Brooks' playoff win means he is the best QB in our history. Thus, Dilfer's Superbowl win=better than AB. Not my opinion, but if you go by those hanging on the jock of that playoff win, it's true. And I am sorry, being given the reigns to a 7-3 team is being handed a playoff team to me. If that means something different to you, then we disagree. They played .500 the rest of the way and made the playoffs. That is being handed a playoff win, cause nothing short of an utter collapse would have kept us out. If nothing else, Brooks has proven heis good for .500.

07-21-2005, 09:09 PM	#31
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Originally Posted by spkb25 but brooks' wasn't handed a playoff team. he was handed a team who could be headed to the playoffs. also williams was hurt after the 10th game in the season and didnt play again, which means our best rusher was and christ am i right on this terry allen. so brooks has as his rusher terrry allen and blake had ricky who that year had already rushed for 1000 yards in 10 games. dude are you honestly going to tell me that that doesn't matter. because we are talking about that year no. bro i really do understand your criticism but man trent dilfer is average. are you saying that brooks is no better then trent dilfer. please don't tell me that Well, some on here are under the impression that Brooks' playoff win means he is the best QB in our history. Thus, Dilfer's Superbowl win=better than AB. Not my opinion, but if you go by those hanging on the jock of that playoff win, it's true. And I am sorry, being given the reigns to a 7-3 team is being handed a playoff team to me. If that means something different to you, then we disagree. They played .500 the rest of the way and made the playoffs. That is being handed a playoff win, cause nothing short of an utter collapse would have kept us out. If nothing else, Brooks has proven heis good for .500.