![]() |
Re: Is It Clear?
Quote:
lol you dont know the half of it. has nothing to do with Roger. Bucs will win division :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: THE BUCS SPELLED S A I N T S |
Re: Is It Clear?
Saints had 41 pressures, a few TFL (tackle for losses) & damn near 10 sacks yet the Failures had no offensive holding calls?
That is mind boggling. |
Re: Is It Clear?
Quote:
|
Re: Is It Clear?
They were holding
Just not getting called on it Watch davenport on almost any play He is learning to fight through the holds |
Re: Is It Clear?
Im not saying we did not deserve those PI calls but there is no way that the Falcons and every single one of our other opponents play a flawless damn near penalty free game.
|
Re: Is It Clear?
Quote:
if somehow San Fran has like 10 penalties for 100 yards and we have like 3, their will be a motive for it. I honestly believe they dont want us on the road in January, Saints been ripping teams better on the road than in the dome. But god forbid if we go to GB, the most beneficial team this year (#1) in penalties that have helped them. |
Re: Is It Clear?
Quote:
|
Re: Is It Clear?
It was clear again to me when Tuttle picked Ryan’s asre wipes pass at the line on scrimmage and oil field drilled his head in the turf. And oh yes there’s the flag no where near highlight reel play blocking in the back a mile behind the play.thats that confirms they can control a game thru out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: Is It Clear?
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
The Cam Jordan push of Ryan in the back is almost simultaneous with Tuttle's stiff arm.Attachment 13325 |
Re: Is It Clear?
Quote:
Just didn’t think it was cam at all but it’s just coincidental he had his hands on his back. I take that Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: Is It Clear?
Quote:
The numbers show it. Its not even up for debate. The only question, I suppose, is whether or not it is intentional. Personally I see what the courts would call a pattern of behavior that spans years and counting. The refs aren't idiots. They are actually very good at what they do. And, in my opinion, they're doing exactly what Roger is telling them to do. |
Re: Is It Clear?
Quote:
|
Re: Is It Clear?
Quote:
|
Re: Is It Clear?
I find the interesting thing about
https://www.nflpenalties.com/team/ne...ints?year=2019 Their is no consistency, however one has to watch the games to really fully understand whats going on. Although aside from the Falcons, seems they less flag happy against bad teams. Its interesting anytime I see GB, Pitt, Minn, and Cinci round up the top 4 of this chart, its been common for a few seasons, we know officiating has big influence in NFC North matchups, why GB sets at 8-3 when they should not be no where near that record. Im thinking some of the officiating problems is combination of betting and bias to wanting certain teams in a division to win it. Like Falcons getting so many penalties this year and few called against them sounds like they trying to satisfy bookies for big money in upsets as that team has the potential to do such after starting off so bad. Cinci as well because its hard to go 0-16 and some point the officiating is going to do enough for them to win, big money for bettors on Cinci. One thing becoming common now is I dread facing any team out of California in fear of officiating controlling the outcome. |
Re: Is It Clear?
Bump ...
https://saintswire.usatoday.com/2019...l-officiating/ Just my opinion here but the Saints will have to leave no doubt on Sunday and take the game AWAY from refs. Did you notice how very little the Failures were flagged on Thanksgiving day ... even with all of those pressures and sacks we had ?? Boy o boy. |
Re: Is It Clear?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:53 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com