|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I just read Danno's final 53 post and no one mentioned Nate Poole. Has he already been cut or is he just stinking it up so bad that he's not worth mentioning?? Also, I've heard Gardner is tearing it up ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-08-2005, 01:39 AM | #1 |
Biloxi Bandit
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: biloxi, ms
Posts: 293
|
Nate Poole/Talman Gardner Q's
I just read Danno's final 53 post and no one mentioned Nate Poole. Has he already been cut or is he just stinking it up so bad that he's not worth mentioning??
Also, I've heard Gardner is tearing it up in camp. How big is this guy and how fast does he run?? |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
08-08-2005, 02:56 AM | #2 |
Problem?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,754
|
RE: Nate Poole/Talman Gardner Q
6'1 and runs a 4.4 40
|
08-08-2005, 07:51 AM | #3 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,723
|
Re: Nate Poole/Talman Gardner Q's
Originally Posted by duece4pres
I had Poole and Gardner fighting for the last WR spot. So far, Gardner has looked great, and I haven't heard Poole's name mentioned once.
I also think there's a 50/50 shot that Poole would still be available mid-season if needed, whereas Gardner would be claimed about 4 seconds after we waived him. Gardner is also fantastic on special teams. Gardner also has as much upside as any WR on this team. He's basically a bigger, stronger, almost as fast, Donte Stallworth. Gardner simply needed a good camp to keep his spot. So far he's blowing everyone away. I'm anxious to see him in actual games. |
08-08-2005, 08:28 AM | #4 |
Deuce
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,894
|
Re: Nate Poole/Talman Gardner Q's
Originally Posted by Danno
I don't know, Danno. Again, we disagree. I think it would take at least 10 seconds.
|