|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Is anyone as confident as I am about Easton filling Peat's spot? He played damn good when Peat was out if I remember correctly....
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
500th Post
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Denver>Memphis>Mississippi
Posts: 741
|
Re: Why did the Saints choose Andrus Peat over Larry Warford?
Is anyone as confident as I am about Easton filling Peat's spot? He played damn good when Peat was out if I remember correctly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Site Donor 2019
|
Re: Why did the Saints choose Andrus Peat over Larry Warford?
Originally Posted by shawnkytonk
I wouldn't rule out Throckmorten to push Easton either. Maybe even Greenidge as well.![]()
From my reading, he (Throck) has played a lot of different (C, G, T) positions while at Oregon. Versatility is the name of the game on the Saints O line. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,060
|
Re: Why did the Saints choose Andrus Peat over Larry Warford?
I am. I think he’s the variable in this equation that no one seems to be talking about. He was brought in to be “the guy” before McCoy fell in their lap and he did very well filling in. He’s also probably the most versatile player along the line.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,840
|
Re: Why did the Saints choose Andrus Peat over Larry Warford?
Originally Posted by shawnkytonk
![]()
They didnt sign Peat to a new contract to have him as a back up. My only thought is Warford is 3 years older, we freed up 7.75 million by cutting him and Peat can play any guard or tackle position. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
500th Post
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Denver>Memphis>Mississippi
Posts: 741
|
Re: Why did the Saints choose Andrus Peat over Larry Warford?
My comment was more geared to Easton being able to fill in if Peat went down.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Site Donor 2018
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lafayette
Posts: 7,753
|
Re: Why did the Saints choose Andrus Peat over Larry Warford?
Just bad memories with peat getting put on his arse on a bull rush he had no answer .was he hurt? Possibly , we will see
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
10000 POST CLUB
|
Re: Why did the Saints choose Andrus Peat over Larry Warford?
Simple. Coaches believe Peat’s ceiling and long term upside is greater than Warford. Fan opinions and PFF ratings be damned.
Does Peat have flaws? Absolutely. But at 26 years of age he also shows flashes of elite play. Just like Armstead when he’s healthy he’s virtually unstoppable. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,547
|
Re: Why did the Saints choose Andrus Peat over Larry Warford?
Throck?
The Saints O Line will be as rugged as The Grand Tetons mountain range. I dub him T'Ton!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Site Donor 2019
|
Re: Why did the Saints choose Andrus Peat over Larry Warford?
Side note - Ethan Greenidge .. a year under his belt in the system. He's big, young and coaches have praised his development from last season.
Depth. |
![]() |
![]() |