Why did the Saints choose Andrus Peat over Larry Warford?

voodooido · 05-14-2020, 12:37 AM

Originally Posted by shawnkytonk

Is anyone as confident as I am about Easton filling Peat's spot? He played damn good when Peat was out if I remember correctly.

They didnt sign Peat to a new contract to have him as a back up. My only thought is Warford is 3 years older, we freed up 7.75 million by cutting him and Peat can play any guard or tackle position.

shawnkytonk · 05-18-2020, 06:38 PM

Originally Posted by voodooido

They didnt sign Peat to a new contract to have him as a back up. My only thought is Warford is 3 years older, we freed up 7.75 million by cutting him and Peat can play any guard or tackle position.

My comment was more geared to Easton being able to fill in if Peat went down.

05-14-2020, 12:37 AM	#1
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,820	Re: Why did the Saints choose Andrus Peat over Larry Warford? Originally Posted by shawnkytonk Is anyone as confident as I am about Easton filling Peat's spot? He played damn good when Peat was out if I remember correctly. They didnt sign Peat to a new contract to have him as a back up. My only thought is Warford is 3 years older, we freed up 7.75 million by cutting him and Peat can play any guard or tackle position.
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,820

05-18-2020, 06:38 PM	#2
shawnkytonk 500th Post Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Denver>Memphis>Mississippi Posts: 741	Re: Why did the Saints choose Andrus Peat over Larry Warford? Originally Posted by voodooido They didnt sign Peat to a new contract to have him as a back up. My only thought is Warford is 3 years older, we freed up 7.75 million by cutting him and Peat can play any guard or tackle position. My comment was more geared to Easton being able to fill in if Peat went down.