Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Cap casualties for all 32 teams (possibly)

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I think Bellamy should stay. He is a good at helping out in the run and he would be a good backup. Bouman is gone. He stunk as a back-up during Pre-season and as a starter after AB was benched. ...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2006, 10:38 AM   #11
100th Post
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 108
I think Bellamy should stay. He is a good at helping out in the run and he would be a good backup.
Bouman is gone. He stunk as a back-up during Pre-season and as a starter after AB was benched. He is old and we have a young back-up in AMAC. He doesn't have NFL experience but he has been a star before with plenty of up-side.

AB, he is a tough one. He would save us a lot. He has worn out his welcome with most fans and he did play poorly last year. But I think he can be a value. I say keep him until the Draft. We may be able to get a good pick for him, if not, we can see if we what holes we still need and cut or trade him after the draft.

Conwell is old and past his prime. Cut him we have Hilton and maybe williams if he rededicatates himself. We will still need a blocking TE that we can get in FA.

Mayberry was a wasted last year. We can get a G in the draft of even a FA. He was a backup, so we can get a backup with the same skills somewhere else, and it would probably be younger.

Fred Thomas is not a starter. He can be a good Nickle back. But we do need a starter. Brown is not that good and he can play Nickle. If we get a starting CB via FA then I say cut or trade Thomas and put brown as a Nickle back.
gfanaticlsu is offline  
Old 02-24-2006, 01:28 PM   #12
Problem?
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,698
Bellamy can go... as far as Thomas, he's productive and can stay. A 4 million dollar cap charge is pretty steep though... so it's debateable if we can sign a quality corner to replace him. I think Ahmad Plummer deserves a good look this off season.
papz is offline  
Old 02-24-2006, 02:04 PM   #13
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
Re: RE: Re: RE: Cap casualties for all 32 teams (possibly)

Originally Posted by FatiusJeebs
Whodi....I can't understand you. Bellamy has done a good job for us. Unfortunately he was injured. Thomas was always getting the shaft from Haslett. When someone went down he would always come in and produce. I've seen Thomas deflect a lot of passes. How can you say I wanna ruin this team?
Dwight Smith=better than Bellamy. They play the same position at that.
Josh Bullocks=FAR FAR FAR more range than Bellamy, and he will be in his second season, coming off a year where he didn't play poorly. So what's Bellamy's role, cheerleader? Bye bye.

As far as Fred Thomas goes, salary dictates a move there, and he is like 32 or something. If he takes a paycut, cool. If not, bye bye. Again, the things you propose make me feel like you would rather this team just stay the same and suck, rather than try to improve.
saintswhodi is offline  
Old 02-24-2006, 02:10 PM   #14
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 973
Bullocks? I don't remember him doing anything spectacular. Anyhow we obviously see these players in a different light. I remember Bellamy and Thomas comin in and doin their jobs well. As far as Dwight Smith and Bellamy I agree. Smith is much better and a better tackler but Bullocks? I thought he made a great impression of burnt toast as far as I'm concerned.
FatiusJeebs is offline  
Old 02-24-2006, 02:17 PM   #15
Problem?
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,698
Bellamy had one good year here (the year before last)... other than that, he was average if even that. Bullocks is going to patrol our secondary for a very long time... I suggest you get use to "burnt toast". Bullocks is going to be a ball hawking playmaker for years to come.
papz is offline  
Old 02-24-2006, 02:36 PM   #16
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 973
I hope so papz. I really hope so.
FatiusJeebs is offline  
Old 02-24-2006, 02:39 PM   #17
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
Originally Posted by papz
Bellamy had one good year here (the year before last)... other than that, he was average if even that. Bullocks is going to patrol our secondary for a very long time... I suggest you get use to "burnt toast". Bullocks is going to be a ball hawking playmaker for years to come.
I have never seen anyone this far off on player evaluations. I am beginning to feel like I did when people would join just to say the opposite of what everyone else does. Of course these are all opinions, but yikes. Jeebs, I have to wonder what team you have been watching all this time. You seem to disagree with everything almost everyone else says about players. Is that by design?
saintswhodi is offline  
Old 02-24-2006, 03:00 PM   #18
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 973
Truth whodi... I watch the games. Whenever I saw Bellamy and Thomas come in (I know Bell was injured but I remember last year) they came in and played solidly. Thomas broke up numerous plays and Bellamy was good at stopping the run. How am I off?
FatiusJeebs is offline  
Old 02-24-2006, 05:41 PM   #19
Breakin Records
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Deville, Louisiana
Posts: 2,167
I dont want to see Thomas go i really like him .....
Bellamy can go we have Bullocks oh yeah and ernie well he sure does get injured lot.... and plus we hot hilton i really like him..... and brooks bouman bye bye bye mayberry didnt really do nuthing for me ...
AllSaints is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts