My FA shopping list

zachsaints52 · 02-12-2007, 11:51 AM

Cooley's a Free Agent? I doubt Washington would let him leave.

hagan714 · 02-12-2007, 02:50 PM

Vikings | Wiggins could get cut
Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:59:37 -0800

John Clayton, of ESPN.com, reports Minnesota Vikings TE Jermaine Wiggins could get cut this offseason.

here is another to think about

blacksaint · 02-14-2007, 07:58 PM

Yo, any of you guys ever hear of a LB by the name of Donnie Edwards. Don't be surprised if he's in the starting lineup. That boy is a BEAST.

SaintFanInATLHELL · 02-18-2007, 07:23 AM

Originally Posted by hagan714

On the Joe Horn front I do not see any FA stepping in at the #1 spot. So does Closton step into that role and we move Henderson into the #2 spot? After last year I hope not. He needs to show better hands. So do we sign Kevin Curtis as an unproven #2 and trade Henderson during camp if he does not show better hands?

That feels like a really bad idea. Henderson did prove himself to be a true home run threat last year. While I may agree that he might not be the reliable #2 guy we need in the receiver corps, he's too valuable in his niche to get rid of even with the hands.

How about drafting a WR say like Rice if he is there. Then you will have to make Closton happy with a new contract. I have no answers here. no matter what you do you have a mess. I say keep Horn

We can't afford Joe at his current contract. Joe has stated that he's not going to renegotiate. Also Joe's inconsistency is injuries. His hands are not helpful if he's not on the field.

It was stated when Joe signed this contract that it was essentially for 3 years. This is the third year and the first year of a big cap hit. After last year I have doubts that it can be worth its value.

Brees has proved that he will deliver the ball to any receiver out on the field. There's no Joe, or Colston, or any other receiver lockin with him.

If Joe will stay for less money, then fine. Otherwise look for a reliable #2, move Colston to the #1, and keep Henderson on as the home run guy.

SFIAH

SaintFanInATLHELL · 02-18-2007, 07:25 AM

Originally Posted by blacksaint

Yo, any of you guys ever hear of a LB by the name of Donnie Edwards. Don't be surprised if he's in the starting lineup. That boy is a BEAST.

Too old and wants too much money.

If you're going to spend serious money at the MLB position, get a young guy in there.

I still don't know what's the deal with Danny Clark. We have the guy on staff and he's a stud. I just can't figure out why Gibbs wouldn't put him on the field full time.

SFIAH

biloxi-indian · 02-18-2007, 10:52 AM

Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL

Originally Posted by blacksaint

Yo, any of you guys ever hear of a LB by the name of Donnie Edwards. Don't be surprised if he's in the starting lineup. That boy is a BEAST.

Too old and wants too much money.

If you're going to spend serious money at the MLB position, get a young guy in there.

I still don't know what's the deal with Danny Clark. We have the guy on staff and he's a stud. I just can't figure out why Gibbs wouldn't put him on the field full time.

SFIAH

SFIAH, I posted the folllowing previously; I followed up on the stats of Edwards, Clark, and Briggs and here are the findings for the last four years (2003 stats are first);

Edwards, last four years with the Chargers;
Tackles 122, 112, 104, 97
Assists 39, 46, 40, 44
Sacks .5, 1, 3, 2.5
Int 2, 5, 2, 3

Clark, one year with the Jags, two years with Raiders, and one with the Saints;
Tackles 29, 98, 82, 23
Assists 11, 31, 31 6
Sacks 0, 2, 1, 0
Int 0, 0 ,0 ,0

Briggs, last four years with Bears;
Tackles 65, 102, 83, 109
Assists 13, 24, 24, 21
Sacks 0, .5, 2, 1
Int 1, 1, 2, 2

Clark is three years older than Briggs and three years younger than Edwards.

I think the stats speak for themselves as to performance on the field. I like Clark, but he ain't no Edwards when it comes to production and performance. Maybe the reason Clark wasn't on the field more...good run stuffer by lacks cover skills.

02-12-2007, 11:51 AM	#11
zachsaints52 500th Post Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Abingdon, Virginia Posts: 522	RE: Re: RE: My FA shopping list Cooley's a Free Agent? I doubt Washington would let him leave.

02-12-2007, 02:50 PM	#12
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	RE: Re: RE: My FA shopping list Vikings \| Wiggins could get cut Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:59:37 -0800 John Clayton, of ESPN.com, reports Minnesota Vikings TE Jermaine Wiggins could get cut this offseason. here is another to think about

02-14-2007, 07:58 PM	#13
blacksaint DARE TO ENTER Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Home Sweet Home, NEW ORLEANS, La. Posts: 1,154	RE: Re: RE: My FA shopping list Yo, any of you guys ever hear of a LB by the name of Donnie Edwards. Don't be surprised if he's in the starting lineup. That boy is a BEAST.

02-18-2007, 07:23 AM	#14
SaintFanInATLHELL The Professor Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Lithonia, GA Posts: 2,647	Re: My FA shopping list Originally Posted by hagan714 On the Joe Horn front I do not see any FA stepping in at the #1 spot. So does Closton step into that role and we move Henderson into the #2 spot? After last year I hope not. He needs to show better hands. So do we sign Kevin Curtis as an unproven #2 and trade Henderson during camp if he does not show better hands? That feels like a really bad idea. Henderson did prove himself to be a true home run threat last year. While I may agree that he might not be the reliable #2 guy we need in the receiver corps, he's too valuable in his niche to get rid of even with the hands. How about drafting a WR say like Rice if he is there. Then you will have to make Closton happy with a new contract. I have no answers here. no matter what you do you have a mess. I say keep Horn We can't afford Joe at his current contract. Joe has stated that he's not going to renegotiate. Also Joe's inconsistency is injuries. His hands are not helpful if he's not on the field. It was stated when Joe signed this contract that it was essentially for 3 years. This is the third year and the first year of a big cap hit. After last year I have doubts that it can be worth its value. Brees has proved that he will deliver the ball to any receiver out on the field. There's no Joe, or Colston, or any other receiver lockin with him. If Joe will stay for less money, then fine. Otherwise look for a reliable #2, move Colston to the #1, and keep Henderson on as the home run guy. SFIAH
	Super Bowl Championships: New Orleans Saints:1, Carolina:0, Atlanta Chokers: STILL ZERO Only Atlanta choked in an unchokable situation... Life is definitely good.

02-18-2007, 07:25 AM	#15
SaintFanInATLHELL The Professor Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Lithonia, GA Posts: 2,647	Re: RE: Re: RE: My FA shopping list Originally Posted by blacksaint Yo, any of you guys ever hear of a LB by the name of Donnie Edwards. Don't be surprised if he's in the starting lineup. That boy is a BEAST. Too old and wants too much money. If you're going to spend serious money at the MLB position, get a young guy in there. I still don't know what's the deal with Danny Clark. We have the guy on staff and he's a stud. I just can't figure out why Gibbs wouldn't put him on the field full time. SFIAH

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

02-18-2007, 10:52 AM	#16
biloxi-indian Site Donor Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Southlake, TX Posts: 1,706	Re: RE: Re: RE: My FA shopping list Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL Originally Posted by blacksaint Yo, any of you guys ever hear of a LB by the name of Donnie Edwards. Don't be surprised if he's in the starting lineup. That boy is a BEAST. Too old and wants too much money. If you're going to spend serious money at the MLB position, get a young guy in there. I still don't know what's the deal with Danny Clark. We have the guy on staff and he's a stud. I just can't figure out why Gibbs wouldn't put him on the field full time. SFIAH SFIAH, I posted the folllowing previously; I followed up on the stats of Edwards, Clark, and Briggs and here are the findings for the last four years (2003 stats are first); Edwards, last four years with the Chargers; Tackles 122, 112, 104, 97 Assists 39, 46, 40, 44 Sacks .5, 1, 3, 2.5 Int 2, 5, 2, 3 Clark, one year with the Jags, two years with Raiders, and one with the Saints; Tackles 29, 98, 82, 23 Assists 11, 31, 31 6 Sacks 0, 2, 1, 0 Int 0, 0 ,0 ,0 Briggs, last four years with Bears; Tackles 65, 102, 83, 109 Assists 13, 24, 24, 21 Sacks 0, .5, 2, 1 Int 1, 1, 2, 2 Clark is three years older than Briggs and three years younger than Edwards. I think the stats speak for themselves as to performance on the field. I like Clark, but he ain't no Edwards when it comes to production and performance. Maybe the reason Clark wasn't on the field more...good run stuffer by lacks cover skills.
	Insanity is defined as doing the same thing over, over, and over again...and expecting a different outcome!