Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Poll (Round 2)

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Yesterday he shure did. *twitch* *shiver* *twitch twitch* Eezy big fela. it will be OK. Just take a coupul of asperen and relacks. Your to sensative to hour misteaks....

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-08-2003, 03:43 PM   #11
500th Post
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Alabama
Posts: 779
Poll (Round 2)

Yesterday he shure did.
*twitch* *shiver* *twitch twitch*
Eezy big fela. it will be OK. Just take a coupul of asperen and relacks.
Your to sensative to hour misteaks.
tweeky is offline  
Latest Blogs


Saints: A glimpse of the future Last Blog: 11-19-2014 By: lee909


What i tell you ! !! ! Last Blog: 11-02-2014 By: SAINTstunna


Old 12-08-2003, 04:41 PM   #12
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,417
Poll (Round 2)

My bad. Sheesh, you guys are harsh...

You make one lousy mistake...

[Edited on 8/12/2003 by JKool]
JKool is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 05:09 PM   #13
500th Post
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Alabama
Posts: 779
Poll (Round 2)

My bad. Sheesh, you guys are harsh...

You make one lousy mistake...

[Edited on 8/12/2003 by JKool]
Thats Kool
4. GMing. I think we need to do a better job of getting talent here and keeping it.

I don\'t know if talent evaluation is as much a problem as properly utilizing that talent, and keeping it around long enough to build a winner.
Yes, we needed to upgrade last years defense. It had some exploitable holes. But a wholesale top to bottom rehaul was probably unnecessary, in hindsight.

I think Knight would have been adequate if we improved speed everywhere else (CB and FS). I don\'t think it was a mistake to let him go, but he sure would have been nice to have when Mitchell unexpectedly went down.

I think Glover was our only major mistake. But a MAJOR one indeed.

Roaf would have cost us a flipping fortune to keep and we were in salary cap hell, and he was unhappy here and wanted out.
Turley was a decent RT but a lousy LT and wanted elite LT money to stay. (remember he rejected a very good offer from us).


Whether we agree or disagree; its all for Him.
tweeky is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 05:33 PM   #14
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6
Poll (Round 2)

1.F
2.F
3.F
COACHING ( THERE IS NO SIGNS OF COACHING AT ANY POSITION. CAN YOU NAME ONE ASPECT OF THIS TEAM THAT HAS SHOWN STEADY IMPROVMENT?)
ciscosaint is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 06:08 PM   #15
Kinder, gentler
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,889
Poll (Round 2)

CAN YOU NAME ONE ASPECT OF THIS TEAM THAT HAS SHOWN STEADY IMPROVMENT?
Profit margin?
BlackandBlue is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 09:14 PM   #16
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wherever I lay my hat
Posts: 3,090
Poll (Round 2)

1. F
2. F
3. F
4. Professionalism

:mad2:
UK_WhoDat is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 09:19 PM   #17
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
Poll (Round 2)

No B&B - haven\'t you heard Benson? He\'s broke. That\'s why he may have to move the team.

10% think Haslett should be head coach next season.
20% think Brooks should continue to start.
10% think AB hurts more than he helps.

Seems like the problems are pretty clear to everyone... unless your name has a B an I two Ls and a Y in it.
WhoDat is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 09:28 PM   #18
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 842
Poll (Round 2)

WhoDat -- for the most part I have really enjoyed debating things with you. I have enjoyed debating several members here. Now, you along with Gator want to bring it on a pesonal level. You 2 are incrediable. It\'s just like saintfan said. The \"good \'ol boy network.\" If I don\'t agree with WhoDat or Gator, then I\'m pathetic. But, let me call someone pathetic or say some of the samethings about someone and god only knows what would happen.

The only one that is discourging members from posting on here is you 2. Not eveyone thinks Brooks should be cut. Maybe on here. But, believe me when I tell you I\'m not alone. Check out some other saints sites. If y\'all don\'t want anyone posting that is pro Brooks, I\'m sure you guys are accomplishing that.

I\'m getting close to not wanting to post here anymore myself.
BillyC is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 09:31 PM   #19
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,417
Poll (Round 2)

Good points Tweeky.

I guess, I can\'t help but feel that our offseason was a bit awful. I too am pretty bitter about losing Glover (and Sammy too). It seems like we bring people in who are long shots or are moving toward the end of their careers (or who are hopelessly over weight). We need to make better bids on players who are coming off their first contracts, players who have a some upside, but who are still proven NFLers (no duh, right?). I just can\'t help but feel that moving so many people in and out of our system and not bartering for players (we do a decent job of getting draft picks) is a serious problem here. Maybe it is coaching, but we know that I\'m reticent to say that... So, I guess I like to blame the GM first; I suppose, I don\'t have much of an argument for that yet, but when I do, I\'ll let you know.

"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks :cool:
JKool is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 09:49 PM   #20
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
Poll (Round 2)

Billy - you don\'t think Jim Haslett or Aaron Brooks have anything to do with the Saints\' problems - or maybe very little to do with them. Everyone else seems to disagree. That\'s not a rip, it\'s a statement of fact.

Tell us again about how the Saints are going to be 13-3 and Brooks is going to go to the Pro Bowl! I love that one!
WhoDat is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts