Question for the Forum

Srgt. Hulka · 02-14-2012, 04:51 PM

I'm certainly no expert, but it seems he would have been convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity. He would have been convicted and promptly hanged. He wouldn't have spent 25 years on death row and spent millions of taxpayer money with an unending appeals process.

WhoDat!656 · 02-14-2012, 05:21 PM

Originally Posted by Srgt. Hulka

I'm certainly no expert, but it seems he would have been convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity. He would have been convicted and promptly hanged. He wouldn't have spent 25 years on death row and spent millions of taxpayer money with an unending appeals process.

War crimes for what?

02-14-2012, 05:21 PM	#2
WhoDat!656 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Shreveport,Louisiana Posts: 16,086	Originally Posted by Srgt. Hulka I'm certainly no expert, but it seems he would have been convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity. He would have been convicted and promptly hanged. He wouldn't have spent 25 years on death row and spent millions of taxpayer money with an unending appeals process. War crimes for what?

02-14-2012, 04:51 PM	#1
Srgt. Hulka 1000 Posts + Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Shreveport, LA Posts: 4,417	I'm certainly no expert, but it seems he would have been convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity. He would have been convicted and promptly hanged. He wouldn't have spent 25 years on death row and spent millions of taxpayer money with an unending appeals process.