|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Boston Saint That’s Loomis’s job to rework the cap. There are many scenarios were it can be done with minimal casualty. While I do agree that you have to look to the future, you also have to ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,051
|
Re: Deshawn Watson.... should we?
Originally Posted by Boston Saint
No, there aren't. When you need to free up $30M there are, for $110M there arent at all and the agents of those that need to be restructured are waiting to rake Loomis over the coals because Loomis has no options.![]()
Our Cap issue will drag out passed the draft because there will be holdouts for restructures. This is going to get ugly. Possibly insurrection at Pat O's. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,137
|
Re: Deshawn Watson.... should we?
Originally Posted by TheOak
“ No, there aren't.“![]()
I guess time will tell won’t it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
5000 POSTS! +
|
Re: Deshawn Watson.... should we?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,051
|
Re: Deshawn Watson.... should we?
Thank you, that video says what I am saying, there aren't many scenarios that get you under the cap, that video is one scenario with many optional steps.... Listing 30 people to be restructured is not 30 ways to get under the cap lol.
You didn't pay attention to the point where he mentions being $20M under with only 39 players and with no BU QB I might add? That is as you put it "with minimal casualty"? His train of restructures and releases leaves you $20M under cap with: No BU QB No BU Center 12 more players short a full roster No Practice squad (Yes they fall under the cap) Free agency Teams generally like to start a season with around $4M minimum to allow them to fill openings that come from injury. You over extend your understanding by saying "It can be done with minimal casualty", then call people silly. Once pressed you retreat under an 'I am not a salary cap expert shield'... Proclaiming Loomis is the expert and it is his job. The salary cap is a number and there is no 'salary cap expert', there are only people very good as finding new ways to make things work. |
It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. ~ Henry David Thoreau
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,137
|
Re: Deshawn Watson.... should we?
Originally Posted by TheOak
Take a chill pill, Oak. I’m not trying to fight with anybody. I never called anyone silly either. I said looking at a 5 Year rebuild plan is silly. I don’t think Payton or Loomis is looking at a 5 year plan. I shared a link to one video detailing a way out of the cap mess everyone says the Saints are in. I watched a different one with Underhill talking about how the Saints have mastered “kicking the can down the road” and he wasn’t as worried about the cap as others. Pardon me. ![]()
This thread started about getting Watson or not. I firmly said no primarily on a) not losing needed draft picks and b) not fitting his contract into the team’s cap mess. I’m not saying it’s easy. I’m just saying I don't expect a big collapse that requires a multi-year rebuild plan. |
You think you know, but you don’t know...and you never will! Coach Jim Mora
|
|
![]() |
![]() |