UDFA Signings

neugey · 05-01-2021, 08:25 PM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

Buford Klambach - G - South Dakota School of Mines

A Hardrocker! That's where my dad went to college.

rezburna · 05-01-2021, 08:39 PM

Originally Posted by SmashMouth

https://twitter.com/nick_underhill/s...28668310859782

I ****in love that name.

SmashMouth · 05-01-2021, 10:34 PM

Large Human!

jnormand and jeanpierre like this.

SmashMouth · 05-01-2021, 10:36 PM

jeanpierre · 05-01-2021, 10:43 PM

2021 NFL Draft Prospect - Alex Hoffman - OL - Carroll College - YouTube

SmashMouth · 05-02-2021, 06:04 AM

SmashMouth · 05-02-2021, 06:15 AM

YouTube (Short URL)

YouTube (Short URL)

Pierre Thomas replacement?

SmashMouth · 05-02-2021, 07:11 AM

YouTube (Short URL)

YouTube (Short URL)

voodooido · 05-02-2021, 09:59 AM

Am I the only one confused by the lack of wr taken in the draft or in udfa?

SaintFanInATLHELL · 05-02-2021, 10:18 AM

Originally Posted by voodooido

Am I the only one confused by the lack of wr taken in the draft or in udfa?

Could it be that the Saints have about 18 WR on staff and apparently the brain trust likes those receivers they have?

I just cannot see why folks cannot understand that the Saints current scheme where MT13 is option #1 and AK41 is option #1A that there simply isn't a whole lot of room for production from the other receiving slots. As I pointed out before the Saints offense has TQS10 out there for nearly 70% of the offensive plays the last 2 years. If the Saints are not happy with his production, then why do they keep running him out there? Why has he not been replaced? Sanders last year didn't replace TQS. He replaced Ginn from the year before. And it showed in the numbers. Sanders had 82 targets for 61 catches in a season where MT13 only played 7 games. Ginn had 56 targets for 30 catches the year before when MT13 caught 149 balls in 16 games. Clearly the #1/#2 production of Sanders wasn't setting the world on fire. And I repeat that TQS10 was out on the field for 70% of the offensive snaps both years.

It's impossible to get production out of a position that isn't targeted.

SFIAH

05-01-2021, 08:25 PM	#11
neugey Hu Dat! Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 6,591 Blog Entries: 13	Re: UDFA Signings Originally Posted by AsylumGuido Buford Klambach - G - South Dakota School of Mines A Hardrocker! That's where my dad went to college. SmashMouth and Rugby Saint II like this.

05-01-2021, 08:39 PM	#12
rezburna 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Kenner, LA Posts: 7,650	Re: UDFA Signings Originally Posted by SmashMouth https://twitter.com/nick_underhill/s...28668310859782 I ****in love that name.

05-01-2021, 10:34 PM	#13
SmashMouth I donated, did you? Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Mandeville, LA Posts: 36,974 Blog Entries: 29	Re: UDFA Signings Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Large Human! jnormand and jeanpierre like this.
	Last edited by SmashMouth; 05-02-2021 at 06:22 AM..

05-01-2021, 10:36 PM	#14
SmashMouth I donated, did you? Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Mandeville, LA Posts: 36,974 Blog Entries: 29	Re: UDFA Signings Twitter

05-02-2021, 06:04 AM	#16
SmashMouth I donated, did you? Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Mandeville, LA Posts: 36,974 Blog Entries: 29	Re: UDFA Signings Twitter

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

05-02-2021, 09:59 AM	#19
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,739	Re: UDFA Signings Am I the only one confused by the lack of wr taken in the draft or in udfa?
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,739

05-02-2021, 10:18 AM	#20
SaintFanInATLHELL The Professor Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Lithonia, GA Posts: 2,647	Re: UDFA Signings Originally Posted by voodooido Am I the only one confused by the lack of wr taken in the draft or in udfa? Could it be that the Saints have about 18 WR on staff and apparently the brain trust likes those receivers they have? I just cannot see why folks cannot understand that the Saints current scheme where MT13 is option #1 and AK41 is option #1A that there simply isn't a whole lot of room for production from the other receiving slots. As I pointed out before the Saints offense has TQS10 out there for nearly 70% of the offensive plays the last 2 years. If the Saints are not happy with his production, then why do they keep running him out there? Why has he not been replaced? Sanders last year didn't replace TQS. He replaced Ginn from the year before. And it showed in the numbers. Sanders had 82 targets for 61 catches in a season where MT13 only played 7 games. Ginn had 56 targets for 30 catches the year before when MT13 caught 149 balls in 16 games. Clearly the #1/#2 production of Sanders wasn't setting the world on fire. And I repeat that TQS10 was out on the field for 70% of the offensive snaps both years. It's impossible to get production out of a position that isn't targeted. SFIAH
	Super Bowl Championships: New Orleans Saints:1, Carolina:0, Atlanta Chokers: STILL ZERO Only Atlanta choked in an unchokable situation... Life is definitely good.