Well now, who's not next

BlackandBlue · 03-25-2003, 07:45 PM

Good post, though I disagree with what you said about Ruff being better than Clemons. The guy has not played much in his NFL tenure, and I think that it\'s hard to compare when I have no evidence to compare with. You are right on with the secondary, though. Mitchell will be a future star on this team, just a matter of time. Knight\'s problem is that the style of game he plays, he has to rely too heavily on the front four to provide adequate pass rush, otherwise, a good quarterback and reciever will burn him down all day. Let\'s just hope whoever fills the position will be able to hit at least half as hard as he did.

03-25-2003, 07:45 PM	#28
BlackandBlue Kinder, gentler Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,889	Well now, who's not next Good post, though I disagree with what you said about Ruff being better than Clemons. The guy has not played much in his NFL tenure, and I think that it\'s hard to compare when I have no evidence to compare with. You are right on with the secondary, though. Mitchell will be a future star on this team, just a matter of time. Knight\'s problem is that the style of game he plays, he has to rely too heavily on the front four to provide adequate pass rush, otherwise, a good quarterback and reciever will burn him down all day. Let\'s just hope whoever fills the position will be able to hit at least half as hard as he did.
	The waiting drove me mad.... I don't want to hear from those that know... Everything has changed, absolutely nothing's changed Eddie is a....draftnik?