New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ? (https://blackandgold.com/saints/101118-de-cameron-jordan-not-effective-he-once.html)

SmashMouth 10-08-2021 10:23 AM

DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Is he on the downside in terms of production versus his previous years?

https://i.imgur.com/bhhBGZX.gif

Maybe we need to wait until Davenport and Onyemata are back before making an assessment?

With our yo-yo performance of late, maybe we should consider this as part of the challenges our D is going through.

neugey 10-08-2021 10:38 AM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Sometimes older veteran players take a while to get rolling. Hopefully after the bye his play will start to pick up.

Lord_Saint83 10-08-2021 10:59 AM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
It’d like to see him in the interior with oynemata. The pressure they’d get up the middle will disrupt any QB. Edge rushing is easier for a QB to navigate than pressure in his face up the middle. Even Drew had troubles with interior pressure

dizzle88 10-08-2021 10:59 AM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Not as effective as he once was is still about twice as effective as Davenport is.

ChrisXVI 10-08-2021 12:55 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Hell yeah he’s on the downside. He’s 32 years old. It took a while for him to become a good pass rusher in the first place and now Father Time is taking it away. It feels like the only times he gets pressure now is on a stunt when the guard doesn’t pick him up or when the QB is out of the pocket.

SmashMouth 10-08-2021 06:51 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisXVI (Post 930890)
Hell yeah he’s on the downside. He’s 32 years old. It took a while for him to become a good pass rusher in the first place and now Father Time is taking it away. It feels like the only times he gets pressure now is on a stunt when the guard doesn’t pick him up or when the QB is out of the pocket.

Couldn't it be that he's been nation making ... With number 5 on the way ? :confused:

jeanpierre 10-09-2021 06:14 AM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by neugey (Post 930884)
Sometimes older veteran players take a while to get rolling. Hopefully after the bye his play will start to pick up.

Yeah, but you can't commit that much salary cap to wait for him to get it going; he's been in decline now going on two seasons; he's already 32yo...

He's played the run extremely well as of late, as well as doing a great job of sealing off the edge to scrambling QBs; but he's getting paid to put QBs on the ground...

The Meat Guy 10-09-2021 08:15 AM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SmashMouth (Post 930898)
Couldn't it be that he's been nation making ... With number 5 on the way ? :confused:

Mebbe...

Rugby Saint II 10-09-2021 11:21 AM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Let's see how he does when we get a decent DT.

Lord_Saint83 10-09-2021 12:10 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II (Post 930932)
Let's see how he does when we get a decent DT.



That’s not out the realm of possibility. Didn’t think of that possibly, with Oynemata back it might free him and the other edge rusher up. Oyenmata might be the key for this d-line to really flourish.

SaintGnome 10-13-2021 05:45 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
I was just watching the highlights of the WFT game and on most of their big plays he was doubled, and not a lineman and a back, two lineman. He looks fast as ever, just needs more help.

ChrisXVI 10-13-2021 06:36 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SaintGnome (Post 931592)
I was just watching the highlights of the WFT game and on most of their big plays he was doubled, and not a lineman and a back, two lineman. He looks fast as ever, just needs more help.

Funny you should mention that… I’m sure a lot of you have seen this graphic recently. It basically shows edge rusher double team rate combined with pass rush win rate.

https://i.ibb.co/vmQhdM3/24291-F14-7...-E03-E2-E6.jpg

Jordan, Granderson and Turner are double teamed more than any DE not named Nick Bosa. Our DT’s are sooo bad that O-Line’s only focus on blocking our edge rushers.

K Major 10-13-2021 06:55 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Turner is a rookie, learning every week as well as getting doubled (see chart) & Granderson hasn't put it all together yet.

Enter David O (disruption in the middle) Davenport in a few weeks as well as Kwon (Blitzer), things drastically change.

turbo_dog 10-13-2021 08:20 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
He may not be getting sacks, but he's in the backfield with pressure a lot still. And then there's that knocked down pass in the last game.

Boston Saint 10-13-2021 08:25 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
To add to evaluation of Jordan’s play this year is the fact that Trey Hendrickson has 4.5 sacks in 5 games in Cincinnati. Of course Guido is gonna complain and moan when I compare his production to Davenport and the 2 first round picks spent on him. But it would be nice to have that production opposite Cam.

But not having Malcolm Brownnand David O on the field has an impact as well.

K Major 10-13-2021 09:18 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Saint (Post 931599)
To add to evaluation of Jordan’s play this year is the fact that Trey Hendrickson has 4.5 sacks in 5 games in Cincinnati.

Trey wasn't an option. Saints could not afford him.

Ramz and Latt were much bigger priorities.

I can't blame the front office brass for letting Trey walk in FA.

Boston Saint 10-13-2021 09:25 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K Major (Post 931600)
Trey wasn't an option. Saints could not afford him.

Ramz and Latt were much bigger priorities.

I can't blame the front office brass for letting Trey walk in FA.

That’s true. Sorry, I was not saying they should/could have kept Trey. Just pointing out that so far up to this point in the season there hasn’t been much help opposite Jordan.

SmashMouth 10-13-2021 10:12 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K Major (Post 931600)
Trey wasn't an option. Saints could not afford him.

Ramz and Latt were much bigger priorities.

I can't blame the front office brass for letting Trey walk in FA.

How is TRex doing anyway...

K Major 10-13-2021 10:30 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SmashMouth (Post 931602)
How is TRex doing anyway...

He's balling.

K Major 10-13-2021 10:33 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Saint (Post 931601)
That’s true. Sorry, I was not saying they should/could have kept Trey. Just pointing out that so far up to this point in the season there hasn’t been much help opposite Jordan.

I gotcha Boston Saint :bng: and you're right. Not much help opposite CJ at the moment. I'm excited about the second half of the season though.

Getting back David and hopefully ... hopefully, we get back Davenport. New ball game with those two guys on the defensive front.

I will say Tanoh has performed well thus far in a rotational role.

NonieT 10-16-2021 09:23 AM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
How bout' he's getting double teamed on every play. Hard to be effective when you have to fight off 2 linemen.

leilung 10-16-2021 09:57 AM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
I think you will see his numbers go up with Oneyemata and Davenport back in the line up. Pressure elsewhere on the line will give him freedom to unleash fury. If he's in single coverage, I'll still take Cam against almost any individual OL in the league!

Thirty3 10-16-2021 10:29 AM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Not concerned about Cam

Lord_Saint83 10-16-2021 12:13 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 


Good info

Rugby Saint II 10-16-2021 01:43 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Cam Jordan is one of my all time favorite Saints. He's playing fine but he needs help on the interior.

K Major 10-16-2021 05:30 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord_Saint83 (Post 931702)

Yep yep. Cam has gotten his fair share of one on one battles but isn’t winning.

Like the guy stated in the video, other guys on the interior must step up as well. Can’t wait to get David, Davenport and Kwon back.

My target 🎯 date for all 3 would be the Tampa game.

jeanpierre 10-16-2021 09:49 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Still, if you go back and compare numbers, Cam has been double-teamed consistently since 2016 - Cam's just not beating the double-teams anymore...

bobdog86 10-17-2021 12:33 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
I think we are feeling the effects of losing Hendrickson more than people want to believe……..

K Major 10-17-2021 01:10 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bobdog86 (Post 931736)
I think we are feeling the effects of losing Hendrickson more than people want to believe……..

Trey had one monster year and being kinda meh for 3 seasons.

Boston Saint 10-17-2021 03:44 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bobdog86 (Post 931736)
I think we are feeling the effects of losing Hendrickson more than people want to believe……..

This is true and deep IMO. Not only do you look at the production of the player, but also look to the resources used to obtain the player. That has a big impact on a team.

Let’s compare two receivers; Tre’Quan Smith and Marcus Colston. Now, obviously Colston was A much better wide receiver and that helped the team. But it’s notable because Colston’s production vs resources and “expectation” was extremely high. Smith’s has been much lower.

Let’s look at Reggie Bush and Kamara. Both very productive backs. Both very dangerous and used well in the offensive scheme. But a IMO Kamara gets more love and respect and has been more “valuable” because he was a bit of a surprise and bargain comparatively (a second and seventh I believe). IIFRC they had Peterson signed as a backup to Ingram already when Kamara ppl was taken vs Bush who was under pressure and had expectations from his first day in camp and had a very high draft pick invested that needed a high return.

Now let’s look at Hendrickson and his investment as a third round pick vs Davenport as 2 first rounders and a third. Simple analyses shows having a good return on investment at a third rounder (like Hendrickson) is huge vs not getting your return (like Smith and Davenport).

So it’s cost is not just missing his production, but also on not having the resources at other positions.

ChrisXVI 10-17-2021 04:29 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K Major (Post 931738)
Trey had one monster year and being kinda meh for 3 seasons.

Yeah it would’ve been a gamble betting on a guy’s contract year spike in production… Unfortunately Hendrickson has 5.5 sacks already this season for Cincy so it ended up not being a fluke.

jeanpierre 10-18-2021 01:04 AM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K Major (Post 931738)
Trey had one monster year and being kinda meh for 3 seasons.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Saint (Post 931747)
This is true and deep IMO. Not only do you look at the production of the player, but also look to the resources used to obtain the player. That has a big impact on a team.

Let’s compare two receivers; Tre’Quan Smith and Marcus Colston. Now, obviously Colston was A much better wide receiver and that helped the team. But it’s notable because Colston’s production vs resources and “expectation” was extremely high. Smith’s has been much lower.

Let’s look at Reggie Bush and Kamara. Both very productive backs. Both very dangerous and used well in the offensive scheme. But a IMO Kamara gets more love and respect and has been more “valuable” because he was a bit of a surprise and bargain comparatively (a second and seventh I believe). IIFRC they had Peterson signed as a backup to Ingram already when Kamara ppl was taken vs Bush who was under pressure and had expectations from his first day in camp and had a very high draft pick invested that needed a high return.

Now let’s look at Hendrickson and his investment as a third round pick vs Davenport as 2 first rounders and a third. Simple analyses shows having a good return on investment at a third rounder (like Hendrickson) is huge vs not getting your return (like Smith and Davenport).

So it’s cost is not just missing his production, but also on not having the resources at other positions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisXVI (Post 931750)
Yeah it would’ve been a gamble betting on a guy’s contract year spike in production… Unfortunately Hendrickson has 5.5 sacks already this season for Cincy so it ended up not being a fluke.

Have been big on Hendrickson since the 2017 draft cycle...

Knew when he broke out he'd be playing elsewhere with the team cap investment and draft capital being committed...

Too bad, we let another good one get away, and I wish him all the best...

Am bullish on Payton Turner and like him as Cam's replacement; in fact, wouldn't be surprised we seize cap savings the next off-season with a post 6/1 move...

But as mentioned, a lot of what if's to consider because of how heavily Sean and his yes-man foolishly invested in a player that was not a franchise QB...

AsylumGuido 10-18-2021 09:49 AM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Water under the bridge. Time to move on.

Boston Saint 10-18-2021 12:34 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 931757)
Water under the bridge. Time to move on.

...

The Meat Guy 10-18-2021 05:58 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jeanpierre (Post 931754)
Have been big on Hendrickson since the 2017 draft cycle...

Knew when he broke out he'd be playing elsewhere with the team cap investment and draft capital being committed...

Too bad, we let another good one get away, and I wish him all the best...

Am bullish on Payton Turner and like him as Cam's replacement; in fact, wouldn't be surprised we seize cap savings the next off-season with a post 6/1 move...

But as mentioned, a lot of what if's to consider because of how heavily Sean and his yes-man foolishly invested in a player that was not a franchise QB...

Oh Boy... that horrid ten first round picks trade for Mr. Glass Jr. Marcus Davenport.

AsylumGuido 10-18-2021 06:15 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Guy (Post 931789)
Oh Boy... that horrid ten first round picks trade for Mr. Glass Jr. Marcus Davenport.

Woe be us! Forgive our pick wasting souls.

https://66.media.tumblr.com/5d54d33b...4x5ro1_400.gif

jeanpierre 10-18-2021 08:52 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Guy (Post 931789)
Oh Boy... that horrid ten first round picks trade for Mr. Glass Jr. Marcus Davenport.

What we could have used that second 1st round pick?

The 2019 NFL Draft Class featured WRz(s) DK Metcalf, A. J. Brown, Deebo Samuel - imagine Sean having anyone of those right now...

AsylumGuido 10-18-2021 09:01 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jeanpierre (Post 931796)
What we could have used that second 1st round pick?

The 2019 NFL Draft Class featured WRz(s) DK Metcalf, A. J. Brown, Deebo Samuel - imagine Sean having anyone of those right now...

ZZZZZZ! Yawn.

jeanpierre 10-19-2021 01:49 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
And then we haven't done too bad with fifth round picks; another really good find in that fifth round at DT would be great right now...

Rugby Saint II 10-19-2021 02:32 PM

Re: DE cameron Jordan not as effective as he once was ?
 
Cam Jordan is still a top player in the league. Not every good player gets a ton of sacks. Running containment on the edge doesn't really allow the outside run which lowers your sack numbers if you're not in all out rush mode. Our corners run man to man mostly which leaves the edge open to running QB's if there is no containment. Jordan is still the man in my book.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com