Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Hendrickson

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Should we have kept TRex and traded away Davenport instead of dealing with Mr Glass Jr continually? Wonder what the cap repercussions would have been....

Like Tree50Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-25-2021, 11:48 AM   #1
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 38,124
Blog Entries: 29
Hendrickson

Should we have kept TRex and traded away Davenport instead of dealing with Mr Glass Jr continually? Wonder what the cap repercussions would have been.
jnormand, MatthewT and dizzle88 like this.
SmashMouth is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 11:54 AM   #2
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,208
Re: Hendrickson

Originally Posted by SmashMouth View Post
Should we have kept TRex and traded away Davenport instead of dealing with Mr Glass Jr continually? Wonder what the cap repercussions would have been.
Literally.

Not giving Andrus Beat that ridiculous contract would have left us with enough to pay T-rex.
jnormand and MatthewT like this.
dizzle88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 12:06 PM   #3
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gulfport
Posts: 1,427
Re: Hendrickson

Trey didn’t become Trey until year 4. We’ve got some good talent that’s still in development. Trey benefited having an available Onyemata last season when he balled out. There hasn’t been any good pass rush since game 1.
That’s when Davenport was reckoning havoc from the jump.
Let’s see what an intact healthy front looks like in a week or two.
cmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 12:21 PM   #4
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,137
Re: Hendrickson

Trey has at least matched if not outplayed Davenport since day one. He’s outplaying him now with another team. The “havoc” Davenport causes in the brief times he is on the field is way overblown IMO. Nothing against him at all. I like him and pull for the guy. But his selection and the trade made to move into that spot have not paid off.

That being said, signing Trey was not possible based on the way things were set up. If we could have turned most of the Peat money into Trey money, and maybe spent the extra first rounder used to get Davenport on another OL position (or WR) then we’d be in great shape. Unfortunately spending additional resources on DL position, then hitting on an even better player at the same position with less a lower pick bit the team in the rear in this case.

You think you know, but you don’t know...and you never will! Coach Jim Mora
Boston Saint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 12:22 PM   #5
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Free State of Idaho
Posts: 5,661
Re: Hendrickson

Hendrickson is definitely earning his pay in Cincy. Davenport is what he always is. Flashes. But inconsistently. And injured.

One has to also question if Hendrickson would've developed quicker had he not been taking a backseat to Davenport while they tried to justify the draft pick for a season or 2.
jnormand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 12:57 PM   #6
Site Donor 2019
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bedford, TX
Posts: 24,619
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Hendrickson

I’d hate to lose Marcus Williams after this season and allowing an elite boundary corner in Lattimore even more.

I’ve never been a fan of huge paydays off one stellar season. Risky.

This is what happens when you draft well. Can’t keep everyone.
K Major is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 02:40 PM   #7
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,482
Re: Hendrickson

Who would’ve been trading for Davenport??
leilung and saintsfan1976 like this.
ChrisXVI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 02:46 PM   #8
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,137
Re: Hendrickson

Originally Posted by K Major View Post
I’d hate to lose Marcus Williams after this season and allowing an elite boundary corner in Lattimore even more.

I’ve never been a fan of huge paydays off one stellar season. Risky.

This is what happens when you draft well. Can’t keep everyone.
Spending two firsts and a third for Davenport was hardly drafting well.
SmashMouth likes this.
Boston Saint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 03:29 PM   #9
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 38,124
Blog Entries: 29
Re: Hendrickson

Originally Posted by ChrisXVI View Post
Who would’ve been trading for Davenport??
Originally Posted by Boston Saint View Post
Spending two firsts and a third for Davenport was hardly drafting well.
Therein lies the rub... prolly no team would have given us anything close to a number 1 pick, et alone what we spent to draft him.
SmashMouth is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2021, 03:43 PM   #10
Site Donor 2019
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bedford, TX
Posts: 24,619
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Hendrickson

Originally Posted by Boston Saint View Post
Spending two firsts and a third for Davenport was hardly drafting well.
Hindsight is 2020. The draft is always a gamble (high picks) however the Saints last 4+seasons of drafting has been better than most.

Davenport is talented but simply injury prone.
K Major is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/101170-hendrickson.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Untitled document This thread Refback 12-09-2022 12:49 PM 21


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts