we can not win with brooks as our qb.

CHACHING · 09-20-2005, 03:20 PM

WEll said Deuce....

saintswhodi · 09-20-2005, 03:20 PM

Originally Posted by TheGambler

Originally Posted by saintswhodi

So what you are getting it is AB played no role in the loss? Is that what I am hearing? You really are gone man.

I never said he played NO ROLE in the loss. I want you to show me anywhere I said that. If you'd quit assuming so much, then you wouldn't have to look like such a blithering HEADCASE most of the time.

I simply said he isn't playing nearly as large a role as most people here are trying to imply. I'm not the only one saying this, either. Look around. Even a few usual Brooks bashers are conceding this fact.

Who is a few, WhoDat? Please. No need to overexaggerate. But I raise you a WhoDat and see you an spk. There, who else you got? Even some normal Brooks lovers are blaming Brooks as part of the reason. Try again. And I am the headcase? How many different people are youdefending Brooks too? Does Brooks pay you?

TheGambler · 09-20-2005, 03:30 PM

Originally Posted by saintswhodi

Who is a few, WhoDat? Please. No need to overexaggerate. But I raise you a WhoDat and see you an spk. There, who else you got? Even some normal Brooks lovers are blaming Brooks as part of the reason. Try again. And I am the headcase? How many different people are youdefending Brooks too? Does Brooks pay you?

A "few" is an overexhaggeration!!? HAHAHAH ..Look up the definition of "few", and "overexhaggeration", and then get back to me.

Why should I NOT defend Brooks when he's being unjustly criticized? You really don't get it, do you? It's one thing to do like some are saying (team loss, turnovers killed us) it's another to take the route of OUR QB IS INEPT and BROOKS COST US THIS GAME! and WE CAN NEVER WIN WITH BROOKS.

saintswhodi · 09-20-2005, 03:35 PM

So WhoDat makes up a few? you have as high an opinion of his as you do of Brooks, and that's saying something. Youreally are smitten over WhoDat aren't you?

Two, our QB is inept, he is one of the reasons we lost, and I haven't seen much winning since he has been here. Next.

spkb25 · 09-20-2005, 03:44 PM

well i have been waiting some years now for us to go better then 8-8. so winning with him hasn't happened yet.

whodat did you not use to tell me that it all comes down to wins and losses. i am not positive that was you but pretty sure that you use to tell me that when i would say that vick is over rated. you would point out how atlanta won with him and loss when he wasn't in. well ....

iceshack149 · 09-20-2005, 03:48 PM

You're kind of angry Whoodi. I'm not looking for a fight. However, my point about last weeks game is that Brooks didn't have to throw the ball because Deuce had so many rush attempts thus eating up the clock. And the only time that Brooks was really forced to throw was on that last drive. Last night he was basically forced to throw at the beginning of the second half.

The TEAM stunk. And that screwed up kickoff return to start the game really set the tone.

saintswhodi · 09-20-2005, 03:51 PM

Originally Posted by iceshack149

You're kind of angry Whoodi. I'm not looking for a fight. However, my point about last weeks game is that Brooks didn't have to throw the ball because Deuce had so many rush attempts thus eating up the clock. And the only time that Brooks was really forced to throw was on that last drive. Last night he was basically forced to throw at the beginning of the second half.

The TEAM stunk. And that screwed up kickoff return to start the game really set the tone.

I'm not looking to fight either. You seem pretty level headed. My point is, the Giants came up with the perfect gameplan to beat us. Take away Deuce, and make Brooks beat you, and he couldn't do it. Cause he had a lot of yards means nothing, they gave him those yards. They were focusing on limiting the run. But he made the critical mistakes they were betting on, and they won. So yes it is a team loss, but that doesn't mean you can't do a blame assessment, and Brooks gets a healthy dose of my blame. If it's not the same for you, kudos. We had 6 turnovers, he had 4(or 3 if you wanna take away the last one) that's better than 50% of the turnovers that led to a loss anyway you slice it. That's unacceptable to me, and has been for years. It's all good man.

TheGambler · 09-20-2005, 03:54 PM

Originally Posted by saintswhodi

So WhoDat makes up a few? you have as high an opinion of his as you do of Brooks, and that's saying something. Youreally are smitten over WhoDat aren't you?

How old are you? Be honest.

saintswhodi · 09-20-2005, 03:56 PM

Originally Posted by TheGambler

Originally Posted by saintswhodi

So WhoDat makes up a few? you have as high an opinion of his as you do of Brooks, and that's saying something. Youreally are smitten over WhoDat aren't you?

How old are you? Be honest.

Apparently old enough to slap you down in every thread on this forum. As did that "newbie" mjf. Just move on. We know you love Brooks and don't want him to get any blame, we get it. Jeez.

CHACHING · 09-20-2005, 04:00 PM

"Slap you down in every thread on this forum"...
whew.......Whodi...you are slowly becoming my hero...........
To quote Fred Sanford.:"Gee Mo Netty"

09-20-2005, 03:20 PM	#32
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Originally Posted by TheGambler Originally Posted by saintswhodi So what you are getting it is AB played no role in the loss? Is that what I am hearing? You really are gone man. I never said he played NO ROLE in the loss. I want you to show me anywhere I said that. If you'd quit assuming so much, then you wouldn't have to look like such a blithering HEADCASE most of the time. I simply said he isn't playing nearly as large a role as most people here are trying to imply. I'm not the only one saying this, either. Look around. Even a few usual Brooks bashers are conceding this fact. Who is a few, WhoDat? Please. No need to overexaggerate. But I raise you a WhoDat and see you an spk. There, who else you got? Even some normal Brooks lovers are blaming Brooks as part of the reason. Try again. And I am the headcase? How many different people are youdefending Brooks too? Does Brooks pay you?

09-20-2005, 03:30 PM	#33
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610	Originally Posted by saintswhodi Who is a few, WhoDat? Please. No need to overexaggerate. But I raise you a WhoDat and see you an spk. There, who else you got? Even some normal Brooks lovers are blaming Brooks as part of the reason. Try again. And I am the headcase? How many different people are youdefending Brooks too? Does Brooks pay you? A "few" is an overexhaggeration!!? HAHAHAH ..Look up the definition of "few", and "overexhaggeration", and then get back to me. Why should I NOT defend Brooks when he's being unjustly criticized? You really don't get it, do you? It's one thing to do like some are saying (team loss, turnovers killed us) it's another to take the route of OUR QB IS INEPT and BROOKS COST US THIS GAME! and WE CAN NEVER WIN WITH BROOKS.
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610

09-20-2005, 03:51 PM	#37
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Originally Posted by iceshack149 You're kind of angry Whoodi. I'm not looking for a fight. However, my point about last weeks game is that Brooks didn't have to throw the ball because Deuce had so many rush attempts thus eating up the clock. And the only time that Brooks was really forced to throw was on that last drive. Last night he was basically forced to throw at the beginning of the second half. The TEAM stunk. And that screwed up kickoff return to start the game really set the tone. I'm not looking to fight either. You seem pretty level headed. My point is, the Giants came up with the perfect gameplan to beat us. Take away Deuce, and make Brooks beat you, and he couldn't do it. Cause he had a lot of yards means nothing, they gave him those yards. They were focusing on limiting the run. But he made the critical mistakes they were betting on, and they won. So yes it is a team loss, but that doesn't mean you can't do a blame assessment, and Brooks gets a healthy dose of my blame. If it's not the same for you, kudos. We had 6 turnovers, he had 4(or 3 if you wanna take away the last one) that's better than 50% of the turnovers that led to a loss anyway you slice it. That's unacceptable to me, and has been for years. It's all good man.

09-20-2005, 03:54 PM	#38
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610	Originally Posted by saintswhodi So WhoDat makes up a few? you have as high an opinion of his as you do of Brooks, and that's saying something. Youreally are smitten over WhoDat aren't you? How old are you? Be honest.
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610

09-20-2005, 03:56 PM	#39
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Originally Posted by TheGambler Originally Posted by saintswhodi So WhoDat makes up a few? you have as high an opinion of his as you do of Brooks, and that's saying something. Youreally are smitten over WhoDat aren't you? How old are you? Be honest. Apparently old enough to slap you down in every thread on this forum. As did that "newbie" mjf. Just move on. We know you love Brooks and don't want him to get any blame, we get it. Jeez.

09-20-2005, 03:20 PM	#31
CHACHING 500th Post Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Golden State Posts: 830	WEll said Deuce....

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

09-20-2005, 03:35 PM	#34
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	So WhoDat makes up a few? you have as high an opinion of his as you do of Brooks, and that's saying something. Youreally are smitten over WhoDat aren't you? Two, our QB is inept, he is one of the reasons we lost, and I haven't seen much winning since he has been here. Next.

09-20-2005, 03:44 PM	#35
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,101	well i have been waiting some years now for us to go better then 8-8. so winning with him hasn't happened yet. whodat did you not use to tell me that it all comes down to wins and losses. i am not positive that was you but pretty sure that you use to tell me that when i would say that vick is over rated. you would point out how atlanta won with him and loss when he wasn't in. well ....

09-20-2005, 03:48 PM	#36
iceshack149 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Fairbanks, AK Posts: 4,299 Blog Entries: 1	You're kind of angry Whoodi. I'm not looking for a fight. However, my point about last weeks game is that Brooks didn't have to throw the ball because Deuce had so many rush attempts thus eating up the clock. And the only time that Brooks was really forced to throw was on that last drive. Last night he was basically forced to throw at the beginning of the second half. The TEAM stunk. And that screwed up kickoff return to start the game really set the tone.

09-20-2005, 04:00 PM	#40
CHACHING 500th Post Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Golden State Posts: 830	"Slap you down in every thread on this forum"... whew.......Whodi...you are slowly becoming my hero........... To quote Fred Sanford.:"Gee Mo Netty"