2022 New Orleans Saints roster breakdown: Running backs/fullbacks

AsylumGuido · 06-23-2022, 03:31 PM

Originally Posted by Boston Saint

I thoroughly read both your and rugbys posts Guido. But wat you did was take one small part of his post and refute it. Your double use of negatives is hilarious. I don’t care about what you didn’t not say. That’s just ignoring someone. You frequently chop one point out of another’s post and ignore everything else.

I interpreted Rugby’s post to basically break down like this:

I. There is a concern about running backs
a) Kamara may miss time
b) There is not trust in backups
c) Will/should a trade happen

In your response you ignore the overall topic and points b and c and jump to casting doubt on a. That’s all you did. But why ignore the overall topic and other points ?

First of all, Boston, I was not refuting ANYTHING that Rugs said. Nor was I ignoring anything he said. What is your problem? All I did was expound on what he said by trying to show how many unknowns there are and what other scenarios are possible. I could just as well placed a stand alone post without using a reply to his at all, but saw no reason to do so.

1. I didn't say there wasn't a concern with the RB's.
a) I acknowledged that Kamara may miss time, but mentioned that as remote as the chance may be, he may not.
b) Nowhere did I say there was a trust in the backups.
c) Nowhere did I refute the possibility of a trade occurring. I did later, however, point out that the acquisition of a vested veteran may be more logical after the first week of the season.

This is ridiculous that I should be trying to defend myself over something that you contrived. And this is not the first time, nor unfortunately, the last I fear.

06-23-2022, 03:31 PM	#10
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,762	Re: 2022 New Orleans Saints roster breakdown: Running backs/fullbacks Originally Posted by Boston Saint I thoroughly read both your and rugbys posts Guido. But wat you did was take one small part of his post and refute it. Your double use of negatives is hilarious. I don’t care about what you didn’t not say. That’s just ignoring someone. You frequently chop one point out of another’s post and ignore everything else. I interpreted Rugby’s post to basically break down like this: I. There is a concern about running backs a) Kamara may miss time b) There is not trust in backups c) Will/should a trade happen In your response you ignore the overall topic and points b and c and jump to casting doubt on a. That’s all you did. But why ignore the overall topic and other points ? First of all, Boston, I was not refuting ANYTHING that Rugs said. Nor was I ignoring anything he said. What is your problem? All I did was expound on what he said by trying to show how many unknowns there are and what other scenarios are possible. I could just as well placed a stand alone post without using a reply to his at all, but saw no reason to do so. 1. I didn't say there wasn't a concern with the RB's. a) I acknowledged that Kamara may miss time, but mentioned that as remote as the chance may be, he may not. b) Nowhere did I say there was a trust in the backups. c) Nowhere did I refute the possibility of a trade occurring. I did later, however, point out that the acquisition of a vested veteran may be more logical after the first week of the season. This is ridiculous that I should be trying to defend myself over something that you contrived. And this is not the first time, nor unfortunately, the last I fear.
	“The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” — Winston Churchill