|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by AsylumGuido How would they accomplish that? Who would get the 2023 first and who would get 2024 third? I can see your point, but can't see any way to pull it off fairly without pissing off other ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Gonzales, LA
Posts: 1,804
|
Re: Dolphins Tampering Penalty Harmed Saints
Originally Posted by AsylumGuido
What about compensatory picks? Those are at best a 3rd rounder.![]()
Just throwing that out there. In this case, the Dolphins didn't actually sign either Payton or Brady, so it's not like a team actually lost someone. Unless you can prove the tampering caused Payton to resign, and that would be difficult if not impossible. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Hu Dat!
|
Re: Dolphins Tampering Penalty Harmed Saints
Originally Posted by stickman
![]()
That's an even better idea. Take away the picks as described by the Dolphins and add compensatory (end of 3rd round) picks for the Saints and Pats. IMO if the league office is to be taken seriously about tampering, not only do they need to punish a team caught in serious violation, but they also need to compensate the team(s) victimized by the tampering. Since the player/coach were not actually poached (although it was attempted), a compensatory pick for each team seems fair. Maybe multiple compensatory picks for the Pats if it's been proven they were tampered with on more than one separate occasion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|