![]() |
Re: Marcus Davenport
Quote:
https://media2.giphy.com/media/266ww...giphy.gif&ct=g |
Re: Marcus Davenport
Quote:
|
Re: Marcus Davenport
Quote:
|
Re: Marcus Davenport
Cut bait
Only plays 1/2 to 3/4 of games each year When he's "healthy" rarely lives up to the hype Cost 2 no.1 picks, dudes stealing money |
Re: Marcus Davenport
Hmm.
I'd bring MD back for 2023. His sack totals aren't higher, but among other things, his pressure rate is on par with 2021. The coverage and safety play were below average compared to a year ago. The former has gotten better in recent weeks, but losing Latt has hurt a lot, and I believe that's why the number of defensive line sacks has decreased. It would be less expensive (see post #5) to bring him back for a year. |
Re: Marcus Davenport
Quote:
|
Re: Marcus Davenport
I'd like to put the franchise tag on Marcus Davenport for 2023. Maybe he'll have a healthy year where he produces and finally lives up to his potential. Otherwise, we can let him walk and get the compensatory pick. I believe that that is where he gives us our most value. I really thought we were going to start playing the compensatory game now but it looks like we're just going to keep extending these guys and plunging into further cap hell.
|
Re: Marcus Davenport
Quote:
You really think that's in our best interest? |
Re: Marcus Davenport
Quote:
|
Re: Marcus Davenport
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com