Should we? - Supplemental Draft Version

BakoSaint · 07-06-2023, 12:05 PM

Wide receiver is not a position of need. Even with MT expected to be reinjured we have depth at receiver and AT as a a project. If there had been a guard or linebacker or something worthy of a 6th round pick I would say yes, because if we draft 1 player with the 1 pick today, Loomis can’t use it to trade up later and get less picks.

Boston Saint · 07-06-2023, 01:00 PM

Originally Posted by BakoSaint

Wide receiver is not a position of need. Even with MT expected to be reinjured we have depth at receiver and AT as a a project. If there had been a guard or linebacker or something worthy of a 6th round pick I would say yes, because if we draft 1 player with the 1 pick today, Loomis can’t use it to trade up later and get less picks.

YouTube

Boston Saint · 07-06-2023, 01:02 PM

Originally Posted by BakoSaint

Wide receiver is not a position of need. Even with MT expected to be reinjured we have depth at receiver and AT as a a project. If there had been a guard or linebacker or something worthy of a 6th round pick I would say yes, because if we draft 1 player with the 1 pick today, Loomis can’t use it to trade up later and get less picks.

I agree with bako that picking one of these guys would be a mistake.

07-06-2023, 12:05 PM	#1
BakoSaint 1000 Posts + Join Date: Dec 2018 Posts: 2,439	Re: Should we? - Supplemental Draft Version Wide receiver is not a position of need. Even with MT expected to be reinjured we have depth at receiver and AT as a a project. If there had been a guard or linebacker or something worthy of a 6th round pick I would say yes, because if we draft 1 player with the 1 pick today, Loomis can’t use it to trade up later and get less picks. SmashMouth and Boston Saint like this.
BakoSaint 1000 Posts + Join Date: Dec 2018 Posts: 2,439

07-06-2023, 01:02 PM	#3
Boston Saint 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Nov 2020 Location: Massachusetts Posts: 5,137	Re: Should we? - Supplemental Draft Version Originally Posted by BakoSaint Wide receiver is not a position of need. Even with MT expected to be reinjured we have depth at receiver and AT as a a project. If there had been a guard or linebacker or something worthy of a 6th round pick I would say yes, because if we draft 1 player with the 1 pick today, Loomis can’t use it to trade up later and get less picks. I agree with bako that picking one of these guys would be a mistake.