|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by neugey It'd be cool to see a team lose their Super Bowl virginity and break through - Lions, Vikings, Bills, Chargers. It's been awhile and the last one was the Eagles which was just gross. Screw the ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: No longer suckered in...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
|
Re: No longer suckered in...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Hu Dat!
|
Re: No longer suckered in...
Originally Posted by AsylumGuido
![]()
The Vikings soft spot is more about my family, friends and colleagues who are fans. Totally understand if the rest of you need to hold your nose. Just think of Justin Jefferson (LSU) LOL |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,068
|
Re: No longer suckered in...
This forum is becoming more about despising teams with a better winning percentage than us, than it is about us winning. They need to hold their nose whenever we stink up the dome.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Professor Crab and
Site Donor 2014 |
Re: No longer suckered in...
This "mortgage the future" strategy started in 2011, with that taste of Super Bowl lingering. The concept of winning another Super Bowl with Brees during the high point of his career didn't cause us to cry out much. A couple of us may have wondered why pay to keep the team intact, but nobody called for new ownership or Loomis' firing. The reality of the choice between keeping known productive assets vs. replacement with the unknown is not a novel concept in sports or exclusive to the Saints in the NFL.
Further, it's actually less profitable to win a Super Bowl than just make the playoffs. As we have seen, perceived value of players is distorted with a ring on their fingers. This causes a huge inflation on current roster salaries across the board. What's worse, is that the QB position appears to be WAY overvalued vs total contribution. (I present practically any QB other than Mahomes as evidence, and even then, he was working off a rookie contract for his first 5 years). My point is, the potential for winning increases asset value, and not necessarily winning itself if there's no real downside to losing (like in the English Premier League). Merch, concessions, co-marketing are more important to the bottom line. No change in ownership will dislodge the economic model. What will change the direction is loss of ticket revenues and lower merch sales. You can point to the J-E-T-S jets jets jets and the GI-AINTS as examples of teams where they can field a roster of penguins and still sell out the stadium and sell merch. So, stop clutching your pearls about the things you can't change and stop going to the games/buying gear. That will motivate everyone to alter strategies relative to winning/managing salary cap. |
Calvin: "I wish I was a Tiger."
Hobbes: "Common lament." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Kenner, LA
Posts: 8,099
|
Re: No longer suckered in...
The fans can stop supporting the Saints if they want. They’ll be in another city faster than you can say Benson.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,068
|
Re: No longer suckered in...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Kenner, LA
Posts: 8,099
|
Re: No longer suckered in...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,068
|
Re: No longer suckered in...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
|
Re: No longer suckered in...
|
![]() |
![]() |