lets go back to 2006

SaintFanInATLHELL · 11-25-2007, 06:37 AM

Originally Posted by Euphoria

Not "everyone" had Reggie Number on on there list. If so Houston wouldn't have passed on him.

Houston passed on Bush because they believed that he wouldn't work within the salary framework they were looking for. They thought it would be become a J Russel type situation.

How is that Reggie Bush pick working out for you???

Bush really isn't the problem. He's worked well in the year and a half thay he's been here.

We missed a great oppitunity to trade the pick and get some extra picks. I do believe that the Draft can be a crap shoot but with more picks you have more of a chance at stricking gold.

Do the math... it takes more than one player to have a good football team. I said it before I'll say it again we are lacking in the talent department and we need a major overhaul in that area which we blew by not trading away the Reggie Bush pick.

Trading the pick would have been foolish from a PR standpoint. Trading the pick if Bush had been picked first may have worked. But it's been nearly two years later and Houston is still being panned for picking Williams.

At the time the Saints needed more than a football player (or two or three). They needed an icon to rally around. Bush has filled that role admirably.

I posit that if the Saints had not picked Bush and done well last year, they would not in fact still be in the region. That's how important picking Bush was.

SFIAH

JOESAM2002 · 11-25-2007, 07:08 AM

Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL

Houston passed on Bush because they believed that he wouldn't work within the salary framework they were looking for. They thought it would be become a J Russel type situation.

Bush really isn't the problem. He's worked well in the year and a half thay he's been here.

Trading the pick would have been foolish from a PR standpoint. Trading the pick if Bush had been picked first may have worked. But it's been nearly two years later and Houston is still being panned for picking Williams.

At the time the Saints needed more than a football player (or two or three). They needed an icon to rally around. Bush has filled that role admirably.

I posit that if the Saints had not picked Bush and done well last year, they would not in fact still be in the region. That's how important picking Bush was.

SFIAH

Not picking Reggie would have been a marketing disaster. He has contributed to the play of this team last year and this year. I don't think he's been used right this year but I'm not the coach either. Reggie was difinitly the right pick for the Saints last year. Tradin g him for picks would have given us more players but how do we know they would have worked out? We don't. Anyway, I agree with SFIAH Reggie was the pick.

11-25-2007, 06:37 AM	#1
SaintFanInATLHELL The Professor Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Lithonia, GA Posts: 2,783	Re: lets go back to 2006 Originally Posted by Euphoria Not "everyone" had Reggie Number on on there list. If so Houston wouldn't have passed on him. Houston passed on Bush because they believed that he wouldn't work within the salary framework they were looking for. They thought it would be become a J Russel type situation. How is that Reggie Bush pick working out for you??? Bush really isn't the problem. He's worked well in the year and a half thay he's been here. We missed a great oppitunity to trade the pick and get some extra picks. I do believe that the Draft can be a crap shoot but with more picks you have more of a chance at stricking gold. Do the math... it takes more than one player to have a good football team. I said it before I'll say it again we are lacking in the talent department and we need a major overhaul in that area which we blew by not trading away the Reggie Bush pick. Trading the pick would have been foolish from a PR standpoint. Trading the pick if Bush had been picked first may have worked. But it's been nearly two years later and Houston is still being panned for picking Williams. At the time the Saints needed more than a football player (or two or three). They needed an icon to rally around. Bush has filled that role admirably. I posit that if the Saints had not picked Bush and done well last year, they would not in fact still be in the region. That's how important picking Bush was. SFIAH
	Super Bowl Championships: New Orleans Saints:1, Carolina:0, Atlanta Chokers: STILL ZERO Only Atlanta choked in an unchokable situation... Life is definitely good.

11-25-2007, 07:08 AM	#2
JOESAM2002 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: CRYSTAL BEACH TEXAS Posts: 4,100	Re: lets go back to 2006 Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL Houston passed on Bush because they believed that he wouldn't work within the salary framework they were looking for. They thought it would be become a J Russel type situation. Bush really isn't the problem. He's worked well in the year and a half thay he's been here. Trading the pick would have been foolish from a PR standpoint. Trading the pick if Bush had been picked first may have worked. But it's been nearly two years later and Houston is still being panned for picking Williams. At the time the Saints needed more than a football player (or two or three). They needed an icon to rally around. Bush has filled that role admirably. I posit that if the Saints had not picked Bush and done well last year, they would not in fact still be in the region. That's how important picking Bush was. SFIAH Not picking Reggie would have been a marketing disaster. He has contributed to the play of this team last year and this year. I don't think he's been used right this year but I'm not the coach either. Reggie was difinitly the right pick for the Saints last year. Tradin g him for picks would have given us more players but how do we know they would have worked out? We don't. Anyway, I agree with SFIAH Reggie was the pick.