|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; What about Oaklands #1 selection this year DaMarcus Russell. After a long hold out this offseason he was all but useless to them this year. Do you label him a bust? Do you give him time to learn the position ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
100th Post
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 167
|
Re: Exhibit A: Meachem; Exhibit B:David
What about Oaklands #1 selection this year DaMarcus Russell. After a long hold out this offseason he was all but useless to them this year. Do you label him a bust? Do you give him time to learn the position and the speed of the NFL? What were his numbers last week 3 out of 10 and a couple picks? That seems like a bust I would cut him. I'm going to hold any judgement on Meachem TILL HE ACTUALLY PLAYS.
As for B the prosecutor drops the case. He sucks he cant understand the man he lines up across from is his responsibility. It is his job to cover the wr and either he cant do or he cant resist the temptation to peek in the backfield. Whatever the problem I dont think it is fixable. This was a match fit for this team and/or scheme. Please suit up Fred Thomas. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Fan Since 1967
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 148
|
Re: Exhibit A: Meachem; Exhibit B:David
Originally Posted by dasaints26
I'm not judging Meachem at all. I am indeed passing judgment on a FO that uses its first pick to take a WR that doesn't play a down all year.![]()
If you think that comparing Meachem, a WR, to a rookie QB, Russel, is a good comparison, and excuses the Saints FO, then, I have no further comments for you. Everybody knows that many rookie QBs take a year to learn . . . but a WR?? Not so often . . . |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Fan Since 1967
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 148
|
Re: Exhibit A: Meachem; Exhibit B:David
My main point is that we, as Saints fans, should try to let the FO know that we are watching their moves, and, we expect them to do a GREAT job, not just an average job.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|