for or against shockey??

SaintFanInATLHELL · 04-14-2008, 08:16 AM

I decided to abstain, because my feeling wasn't listed.

No: because he'll cost too much in picks/players and any offensive improvement will in fact be marginal.

We're already a top 3 offense in the league.

Last time I checked, the #1 offense from the last two years, including the best offense in the history of the game last year, did not in fact win the SB.

The sig is a reminder of what we really need to do.

Tobias-Reiper · 04-14-2008, 12:34 PM

Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL

I decided to abstain, because my feeling wasn't listed.

No: because he'll cost too much in picks/players and any offensive improvement will in fact be marginal.

We're already a top 3 offense in the league.

Last time I checked, the #1 offense from the last two years, including the best offense in the history of the game last year, did not in fact win the SB.

The sig is a reminder of what we really need to do.

..funny, neither did the #1 defense.. balance, that's what's all about..

...as for Shockey, you and ScottF made good points... however, I just don't like Johnson. He looks awkward out there, and seems that every timet anyone hits him he's going to break. I like Miller better than Johnson.

B_Dub_Saint · 04-14-2008, 02:33 PM

I voted either way Geaux Saints. I know if I would have said screw him, he probably would have came out like a beast and took us to the superbowl then I would be a total hypocrate

FireVenturi · 04-15-2008, 12:09 AM

yea, the Giants are crazy with what they want for him, Mickey should tell the Giants......A third round pick for him or dont call back!!!!!! What do we have to lose?

saintsfan1976 · 04-15-2008, 08:28 AM

Originally Posted by FireVenturi

A third round pick for him or dont call back!!!!!! What do we have to lose?

Seriously??

Frederick Smith · 04-15-2008, 08:48 AM

I believe Shockey is still one of the premier tight ends in the league and agree with Merces. Something about Johnson does not add up. Johnson at times appears to have really soft hands but cannot avoid being clobbered. Everytime He gets hit I expect to see the ball pop out or for Him to stay down. I think some kind of trade needs to be worked out for an active roster player ( Maybe Stecker and David Ha!) and a high round draft choice. LOOMIS PLEASE DO NOT PULL ANOTHER MIKE DITKA ON US. Most everyone believes DEFENSE is our priority and I also feel we need another back (Forte) but that would be the only offensive player I would take. Defense has to compliment the offense. the old saying still rings true DEFENSE wins SUPERBOWLS

saintnation27 · 04-16-2008, 01:44 AM

Originally Posted by frankeefrank

I don't belive Shockey is a cancer... But I alos don't believe he is right for this team.

Why not make a move on a guy like LJ Smith or Kellen Winslow?

umm. he is a perfect fit for this team. Brees made Gates look like a god in SD. if we made a move it sure wouldn't be for LJ Smith, maybe Winslow(who happens to be the same type of player as shockey) but not LJ.

pakowitz · 04-18-2008, 11:16 PM

well it looks like alot of people really want shockey...

beauchristopher · 04-19-2008, 12:56 AM

Shockey and Johnson were impressive when they faced each other in the playoffs in 2003.. I can't imagine both on the same team in the playoffs this season. I'm not for or against getting Shockey.. I just don't want to lose all our picks in the mid rounds, bc I believe there is great value in the draft after round one.

View Poll Results: shockey, yes or no?
yes, makes our offense a juggernaut	26	56.52%
no, hes a cancer and will ruin our team	7	15.22%
dont really care either way, GEAUX SAINTS!!	13	28.26%
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll

04-14-2008, 08:16 AM	#11
SaintFanInATLHELL The Professor Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Lithonia, GA Posts: 2,776	Re: for or against shockey?? I decided to abstain, because my feeling wasn't listed. No: because he'll cost too much in picks/players and any offensive improvement will in fact be marginal. We're already a top 3 offense in the league. Last time I checked, the #1 offense from the last two years, including the best offense in the history of the game last year, did not in fact win the SB. The sig is a reminder of what we really need to do.

04-14-2008, 12:34 PM	#12
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Re: for or against shockey?? Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL I decided to abstain, because my feeling wasn't listed. No: because he'll cost too much in picks/players and any offensive improvement will in fact be marginal. We're already a top 3 offense in the league. Last time I checked, the #1 offense from the last two years, including the best offense in the history of the game last year, did not in fact win the SB. The sig is a reminder of what we really need to do. ..funny, neither did the #1 defense.. balance, that's what's all about.. ...as for Shockey, you and ScottF made good points... however, I just don't like Johnson. He looks awkward out there, and seems that every timet anyone hits him he's going to break. I like Miller better than Johnson.

04-14-2008, 02:33 PM	#13
B_Dub_Saint 1000 Posts + Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Lafayette, LA Posts: 2,345 Blog Entries: 1	Re: for or against shockey?? I voted either way Geaux Saints. I know if I would have said screw him, he probably would have came out like a beast and took us to the superbowl then I would be a total hypocrate

04-15-2008, 12:09 AM	#14
FireVenturi Cold as Ice! Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Da Big Easy Posts: 2,978	Re: for or against shockey?? yea, the Giants are crazy with what they want for him, Mickey should tell the Giants......A third round pick for him or dont call back!!!!!! What do we have to lose?

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

04-15-2008, 08:28 AM	#15
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,849 Blog Entries: 3	Re: for or against shockey?? Originally Posted by FireVenturi A third round pick for him or dont call back!!!!!! What do we have to lose? Seriously??

04-15-2008, 08:48 AM	#16
Frederick Smith SaintsFan101 Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 217	Re: for or against shockey?? I believe Shockey is still one of the premier tight ends in the league and agree with Merces. Something about Johnson does not add up. Johnson at times appears to have really soft hands but cannot avoid being clobbered. Everytime He gets hit I expect to see the ball pop out or for Him to stay down. I think some kind of trade needs to be worked out for an active roster player ( Maybe Stecker and David Ha!) and a high round draft choice. LOOMIS PLEASE DO NOT PULL ANOTHER MIKE DITKA ON US. Most everyone believes DEFENSE is our priority and I also feel we need another back (Forte) but that would be the only offensive player I would take. Defense has to compliment the offense. the old saying still rings true DEFENSE wins SUPERBOWLS

04-16-2008, 01:44 AM	#17
saintnation27 Rookie Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 2	Re: for or against shockey?? Originally Posted by frankeefrank I don't belive Shockey is a cancer... But I alos don't believe he is right for this team. Why not make a move on a guy like LJ Smith or Kellen Winslow? umm. he is a perfect fit for this team. Brees made Gates look like a god in SD. if we made a move it sure wouldn't be for LJ Smith, maybe Winslow(who happens to be the same type of player as shockey) but not LJ.
saintnation27 Rookie Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 2

04-18-2008, 11:16 PM	#18
pakowitz The Dark Overlord Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,450	Re: for or against shockey?? well it looks like alot of people really want shockey...

04-19-2008, 12:56 AM	#19
beauchristopher 100th Post Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 227	Re: for or against shockey?? Shockey and Johnson were impressive when they faced each other in the playoffs in 2003.. I can't imagine both on the same team in the playoffs this season. I'm not for or against getting Shockey.. I just don't want to lose all our picks in the mid rounds, bc I believe there is great value in the draft after round one.
	Last edited by beauchristopher; 04-19-2008 at 01:03 AM..