for or against shockey??

SaintFanInATLHELL · 04-14-2008, 07:16 AM

I decided to abstain, because my feeling wasn't listed.

No: because he'll cost too much in picks/players and any offensive improvement will in fact be marginal.

We're already a top 3 offense in the league.

Last time I checked, the #1 offense from the last two years, including the best offense in the history of the game last year, did not in fact win the SB.

The sig is a reminder of what we really need to do.

Tobias-Reiper · 04-14-2008, 11:34 AM

Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL

I decided to abstain, because my feeling wasn't listed.

No: because he'll cost too much in picks/players and any offensive improvement will in fact be marginal.

We're already a top 3 offense in the league.

Last time I checked, the #1 offense from the last two years, including the best offense in the history of the game last year, did not in fact win the SB.

The sig is a reminder of what we really need to do.

..funny, neither did the #1 defense.. balance, that's what's all about..

...as for Shockey, you and ScottF made good points... however, I just don't like Johnson. He looks awkward out there, and seems that every timet anyone hits him he's going to break. I like Miller better than Johnson.

View Poll Results: shockey, yes or no?
yes, makes our offense a juggernaut	26	56.52%
no, hes a cancer and will ruin our team	7	15.22%
dont really care either way, GEAUX SAINTS!!	13	28.26%
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll

04-14-2008, 11:34 AM	#2
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Re: for or against shockey?? Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL I decided to abstain, because my feeling wasn't listed. No: because he'll cost too much in picks/players and any offensive improvement will in fact be marginal. We're already a top 3 offense in the league. Last time I checked, the #1 offense from the last two years, including the best offense in the history of the game last year, did not in fact win the SB. The sig is a reminder of what we really need to do. ..funny, neither did the #1 defense.. balance, that's what's all about.. ...as for Shockey, you and ScottF made good points... however, I just don't like Johnson. He looks awkward out there, and seems that every timet anyone hits him he's going to break. I like Miller better than Johnson.

04-14-2008, 07:16 AM	#1
SaintFanInATLHELL The Professor Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Lithonia, GA Posts: 2,783	Re: for or against shockey?? I decided to abstain, because my feeling wasn't listed. No: because he'll cost too much in picks/players and any offensive improvement will in fact be marginal. We're already a top 3 offense in the league. Last time I checked, the #1 offense from the last two years, including the best offense in the history of the game last year, did not in fact win the SB. The sig is a reminder of what we really need to do.