Saftey Help

JKool · 04-29-2008, 03:29 PM

I looked over several other Safeties that are considered good, and they have similar stats to Polamalu.

As for stats being for losers, whatever.

I agree that these two Safeties we have are not good. I'm not sure why you can't admit they don't suck. The stats sheets contain information, even if it is summarized and subjet to some interpretation.

Finally, I have seen a good number of games, and I know full well that (unless you are present at the actual game, and for some reason not paying attention to the ball) that it is very difficult to see what the Safeties are doing on most plays. I've seen our Safeties make several mistakes, as have you I'm sure.

However, I don't think a small amount of anecdotal evidence is sufficient to write them off. They are starters on an NFL team. Could they be better? Yes. Could they be worse? Yes.

04-29-2008, 03:29 PM	#14
JKool 1000 Posts + Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 2,423	Re: Saftey Help I looked over several other Safeties that are considered good, and they have similar stats to Polamalu. As for stats being for losers, whatever. I agree that these two Safeties we have are not good. I'm not sure why you can't admit they don't suck. The stats sheets contain information, even if it is summarized and subjet to some interpretation. Finally, I have seen a good number of games, and I know full well that (unless you are present at the actual game, and for some reason not paying attention to the ball) that it is very difficult to see what the Safeties are doing on most plays. I've seen our Safeties make several mistakes, as have you I'm sure. However, I don't think a small amount of anecdotal evidence is sufficient to write them off. They are starters on an NFL team. Could they be better? Yes. Could they be worse? Yes.
	"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks