A quick look at the WR

papz · 05-11-2008, 12:01 PM

You did look at his measurements before you called Arrington short and slow right? Bare in mind also that Colston isn't exactly a burner himself. Sure Arrington isn't guaranteed a spot, but his chances are slightly better than the UDFA's. If he makes the team, he'll hold the last roster spot at WR. Expecting him to be a starter or get significant playing time would be a bit much... but heck Colston did it. If you show that you can produce, Payton will find a place to play you.

This is how I'd like for it to play out...

Colston and Meachem starting with Patten in the slot. Henderson as our 4th, Cooper 5th, and Arrington winning out the last spot. It all depends on how much Meachem has grown this past year.

CantonLegend · 05-11-2008, 12:14 PM

Originally Posted by papz

You did look at his measurements...

i didnt mean to say short i meant to say small....but ur right...he has good height....he has a very wirey frame...kinda lanky...his breakaway speed fails to impress because he couldnt breakaway.....his hands are his strong point...he can catch the ball which is the most important characteristic in NFL WRs....i just dont see him being an effective threat in our offense

pakowitz · 05-11-2008, 08:39 PM

Originally Posted by CantonLegend

....i just dont see him being an effective threat in our offense

i have to disagree with this statement b/c he is a good route runner and has good hands and that plays into the strength of our offense b/c of it being timing based and more of quick short passes.. we have alot of WRs who are more athletic but not overly great at catching the ball other then colston (who also has the dropsies at times) arringtons ability to just make the catch will be very effective in our offense

CantonLegend · 05-12-2008, 01:58 PM

Originally Posted by pakowitz

i have to disagree with this statement b/c he is a good route runner and has good hands and that plays into the strength of our offense b/c of it being timing based and more of quick short passes.. we have alot of WRs who are more athletic but not overly great at catching the ball other then colston (who also has the dropsies at times) arringtons ability to just make the catch will be very effective in our offense

i like ur point because catching IS THE MOST IMPORTANT characteristic of NFL receivers....he has to be a good route runner(and he is decent) because he doesnt have the great speed that the position often requires....i liked watching him in michigan cuz thats my fav college team...but he never really impressed me....i think that if he does play he will get a lot of 1-1 coverage because of colston and the rise of meachem...as well as patten being a great catcher....the more i watch film of him because of this annoying thread the more i like his fundamentals..he doesnt have the breakout speed or the amazing hands of a calvin johnson or a larry fitz but he does the basics really well....he runs routes....he jumps high enough...his catching is his strong point....and he definitly is not afraid to get hit....i watched a few that would put me down for days lol....i hate to do this but i hafta fall back on the fact that he doesnt have ne thing great about what he does.....our depth at receiver just wont allow for a sub-par guy....i just dont see it

ScottF · 05-12-2008, 04:35 PM

Originally Posted by papz

This is how I'd like for it to play out...

Colston and Meachem starting with Patten in the slot. Henderson as our 4th, Cooper 5th, and Arrington winning out the last spot. It all depends on how much Meachem has grown this past year.

If we carry 6 WR's, then I don't think we can keep 4 RB's, so that would be it for Stecker.

A lot surprisingly depends on Porter. If he can return kicks, then Moore and Stecker probably go. If he is a great ST cover guy, then Copper is gone.

I personally hope Arrington and Meachem step up and produce, allowing us to cut Henderson. I am tired of waiting for him to live up to his over-hyped potential. Just go already-no regrets.

CantonLegend · 05-12-2008, 04:37 PM

Originally Posted by ScottF

If we carry 6 WR's, then I don't think we can keep 4 RB's, so that would be it for Stecker.

A lot surprisingly depends on Porter. If he can return kicks, then Moore and Stecker probably go. If he is a great ST cover guy, then Copper is gone.

I personally hope Arrington and Meachem step up and produce, allowing us to cut Henderson. I am tired of waiting for him to live up to his over-hyped potential. Just go already-no regrets.

a lot of bold statements all in one post

05-11-2008, 12:01 PM	#1
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,768	Re: A quick look at the WR You did look at his measurements before you called Arrington short and slow right? Bare in mind also that Colston isn't exactly a burner himself. Sure Arrington isn't guaranteed a spot, but his chances are slightly better than the UDFA's. If he makes the team, he'll hold the last roster spot at WR. Expecting him to be a starter or get significant playing time would be a bit much... but heck Colston did it. If you show that you can produce, Payton will find a place to play you. This is how I'd like for it to play out... Colston and Meachem starting with Patten in the slot. Henderson as our 4th, Cooper 5th, and Arrington winning out the last spot. It all depends on how much Meachem has grown this past year.
	Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege. All little common sense goes a long way.

05-11-2008, 12:14 PM	#2
CantonLegend 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Canton, Ohio Posts: 2,685 Blog Entries: 2	Re: A quick look at the WR Originally Posted by papz You did look at his measurements... i didnt mean to say short i meant to say small....but ur right...he has good height....he has a very wirey frame...kinda lanky...his breakaway speed fails to impress because he couldnt breakaway.....his hands are his strong point...he can catch the ball which is the most important characteristic in NFL WRs....i just dont see him being an effective threat in our offense

05-11-2008, 08:39 PM	#3
pakowitz The Dark Overlord Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,450	Re: A quick look at the WR Originally Posted by CantonLegend ....i just dont see him being an effective threat in our offense i have to disagree with this statement b/c he is a good route runner and has good hands and that plays into the strength of our offense b/c of it being timing based and more of quick short passes.. we have alot of WRs who are more athletic but not overly great at catching the ball other then colston (who also has the dropsies at times) arringtons ability to just make the catch will be very effective in our offense

05-12-2008, 01:58 PM	#4
CantonLegend 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Canton, Ohio Posts: 2,685 Blog Entries: 2	Re: A quick look at the WR Originally Posted by pakowitz i have to disagree with this statement b/c he is a good route runner and has good hands and that plays into the strength of our offense b/c of it being timing based and more of quick short passes.. we have alot of WRs who are more athletic but not overly great at catching the ball other then colston (who also has the dropsies at times) arringtons ability to just make the catch will be very effective in our offense i like ur point because catching IS THE MOST IMPORTANT characteristic of NFL receivers....he has to be a good route runner(and he is decent) because he doesnt have the great speed that the position often requires....i liked watching him in michigan cuz thats my fav college team...but he never really impressed me....i think that if he does play he will get a lot of 1-1 coverage because of colston and the rise of meachem...as well as patten being a great catcher....the more i watch film of him because of this annoying thread the more i like his fundamentals..he doesnt have the breakout speed or the amazing hands of a calvin johnson or a larry fitz but he does the basics really well....he runs routes....he jumps high enough...his catching is his strong point....and he definitly is not afraid to get hit....i watched a few that would put me down for days lol....i hate to do this but i hafta fall back on the fact that he doesnt have ne thing great about what he does.....our depth at receiver just wont allow for a sub-par guy....i just dont see it
	"deal with it or you can go play the saints and get trounced by 30 and you won't have to worry about it."-colin cowherd

05-12-2008, 04:35 PM	#5
ScottF 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 6,324	Re: A quick look at the WR Originally Posted by papz This is how I'd like for it to play out... Colston and Meachem starting with Patten in the slot. Henderson as our 4th, Cooper 5th, and Arrington winning out the last spot. It all depends on how much Meachem has grown this past year. If we carry 6 WR's, then I don't think we can keep 4 RB's, so that would be it for Stecker. A lot surprisingly depends on Porter. If he can return kicks, then Moore and Stecker probably go. If he is a great ST cover guy, then Copper is gone. I personally hope Arrington and Meachem step up and produce, allowing us to cut Henderson. I am tired of waiting for him to live up to his over-hyped potential. Just go already-no regrets.

05-12-2008, 04:37 PM	#6
CantonLegend 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Canton, Ohio Posts: 2,685 Blog Entries: 2	Re: A quick look at the WR Originally Posted by ScottF If we carry 6 WR's, then I don't think we can keep 4 RB's, so that would be it for Stecker. A lot surprisingly depends on Porter. If he can return kicks, then Moore and Stecker probably go. If he is a great ST cover guy, then Copper is gone. I personally hope Arrington and Meachem step up and produce, allowing us to cut Henderson. I am tired of waiting for him to live up to his over-hyped potential. Just go already-no regrets. a lot of bold statements all in one post