|
View Poll Results: Who is the Saints best Running Back? | |||
Reggie Bush |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 21.21% |
Pierre Thomas |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 57.58% |
Mike Bell |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 21.21% |
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll |
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Some people will just never get it. I'm still trying to figure out how Bell was a stud in '06. He had one game of over 100 yards that year, played the majority of the year behind an offensive line ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#17 |
Faqda Falcons
|
Re: Best Saints Running Back
Some people will just never get it. I'm still trying to figure out how Bell was a stud in '06. He had one game of over 100 yards that year, played the majority of the year behind an offensive line that was notorious for being excellent under Shanahan and only averaged 4.3 YPC, and scored less TD's in 15 games than Pierre scored last year in 9 games. Pierre also had 30 less carries last year compared to Bell in '06. Tatum Bell was ahead of him on the depth chart. Where is Tatum Bell now? Mike Bell played great in preseason. I give him that. However, Payton said himself that PT was the starter going into the season. The only reason Bell got the opportunity was because of PT's knee. I ask again. Does PT lose the job because of injury? If this is the case and Bell "earned" the starting job over PT, then shouldn't the same apply here? Shouldn't Bell lose his "starting" spot that he so greatly "earned" since he hurt his knee? Do your homework, Canton, because you are failing miserably to prove your point.
|
People shouldn't be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people.
|
|
![]() |