|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by exile Bolts4life is no troll guys and girls. To the question, I was simply amazed that SD drafted Manning when they did. I thought that Brees was their franchise QB at the time for years to come. ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
OUR NEW REGIME!
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 564
|
Re: Would things have been different if...
Originally Posted by exile
![]()
Man... I'm glad that didn't happen. IMO, Eli is average at best and it's a joke that he got Super Bowl MVP. If it wasn't for his last name, he wouldn't have been a #1 draft pick. Probably not even top 10. Not only did we get the better QB but we also got Merriman and Keading out of this. Imagine where Giants could be now had they kept Rivers? Honestly... if we had Eli, I think we'd suck. Rivers is the reason we are where we are right now. He carried the team on his back for at least 7 games. I don't believe Eli could have done that. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
A Cajun Transforming TX
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 2,787
|
Re: Would things have been different if...
Originally Posted by BOLTS4LIFE
If Eli is average, there are a boatload of below average QBs in the league. But back to the OP, of course things would have been different. Without Brees we would have never had the magical 2006 season and probably still be looking for a franchise QB and not on this unbelieveable undefeated run.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
OUR NEW REGIME!
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 564
|
Re: Would things have been different if...
Originally Posted by Budsdrinker
If his last name was not Manning, do you think he would have been a #1 draft pick? I don't.![]()
If his last name was not Manning, do you think ESPN would still have a hefty man crush on him? I don't. If his last name was not Manning, do you think he would have got Super Bowl MVP with the same stats? I don't? Now for the bigger question... is he better than Brees or Rivers? I say "HELL NO!!!" Like said... the QB situation in San Diego benefited both teams. You know what was really funny? Raiders fans taking smack when Brooks came to their team and ending up at 2-14!!! LOL!!! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
A Cajun Transforming TX
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 2,787
|
Re: Would things have been different if...
Originally Posted by BOLTS4LIFE
Don't want to get in an argument here but based on Eli's college stats, yes he was worthy of a number 1 pick. On a local level he broke most of Peyton's high school records so yes he was highly recruited. He is in the top 10 in a lot of the SEC records including yards, tds and passer rating. Now with all that said I'm glad we have Brees but back in 2006 if I would have been given a choice (if I could have either one) it would have been tough not taking Eli based on the fact of not knowing how healthy Brees' shoulder would be.
![]()
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
OUR NEW REGIME!
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 564
|
Re: Would things have been different if...
Originally Posted by Budsdrinker
![]()
Well that's a given. Nobody knew if he had anything left after the shoulder injury. Though I can think of many QBs I'd rather have on my team instead of Eli. |
![]() |