|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Vike4Life I didn't bring up the "We beat X team you guys lost to X team, we will win!" you did . I just showed it goes both ways. I don't think you read my first response ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
500th Post
|
Re: 4 on grass, 11 on artifical turf
Originally Posted by Vike4Life
I don't think you read my first response so I will repost it.![]()
'So let's just say being 2-0 away in a dome vs. the cellar of the NFL doesn't count. That is like saying, "The Saints destroyed the Cards, and they beat up on the Vikes......Saints will win."' Just in case you still don't get it, I am referring to how STUPID the two arguments are. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 72
|
Re: 4 on grass, 11 on artifical turf
Originally Posted by mighty12
I apologize for the misread, I've just read the Saints Cards arguement too many times.![]()
As for the 2-0 against horrible teams on artifical turf, the Vikes didn't have any other option. After this game it will have greater weight. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
500th Post
|
Re: 4 on grass, 11 on artifical turf
I am sure you hate it as much as we hate the Cowboys Vike argument. Any given Sunday......HELL YEAH!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: "Little Ole Town in Tejas"
Posts: 7,586
|
Re: 4 on grass, 11 on artifical turf
Ok i guess if you like sarcastic jabs at our team.. then debate away..sorry my bad.
|
Last edited by strato; 01-24-2010 at 11:56 AM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 72
|
Re: 4 on grass, 11 on artifical turf
Originally Posted by strato
I only get sarcastic when the response to one of my stats or observations is "Saints are the better team" and nothing else. ![]()
If someone says Saints have better WR's, I'll agree in a second. If someone says Brees is better than Favre, it's debateable as I think experience helps over youth. But lets face it they both have top QB ratings so both are not Sanchez If someone says Bush is better than Harvin, I say given this season which is all we have on Harvin, he's not. But Bush has shown he is a different player in the playoffs and Harvin is not 100%. If someone says, Saints CB's are better, hands down they are right. If someone says Evans is better than Hutchinson, I just laugh. There is a good chance Hutch will be a HOFer and still has lots in the tank. If someone says, Shockey is better than Shiancoe, I say Shock might be marginally better, but not while he's hurting. If someone says Bush, Thomas, and Bell are better than Peterson and Taylor. Look in the Saints' box, count to 8 or 9. If not, count to 10+yds. Favre counts on single coverage on Rice or Berrian. If someone says Hartley is better than Longwell at FG's, I say, pray the pressure doesn't make Hartley choke. Longwell has been there and done that. There are pluses and minuses on both sides, I point out the Vikes. I don't consider it smack talk. But I'm fully capable of agreeing with Saint fans on several points. But I'm not inclined to point them out like above. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/24121-4-grass-11-artifical-turf.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 01-24-2010 08:47 AM | 1 |